Back to Search Start Over

3-dimensional Ability Assessment in Removing Root Filling Material from Pair-matched Oval-shaped Canals Using Thermal-treated Instruments.

Authors :
De-Deus G
Belladonna FG
Zuolo AS
Cavalcante DM
Simões Carvalho M
Marinho A
Souza EM
Lopes RT
Silva EJNL
Source :
Journal of endodontics [J Endod] 2019 Sep; Vol. 45 (9), pp. 1135-1141. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jul 23.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of the XP-endo Shaper instrument (FKG Dentaire, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) during the removal of root fillings from oval-shaped canals. M-Wire Reciproc and Reciproc Blue systems (VDW, Munich, Germany) were used as reference instruments for comparison, and micro-computed technology was used as an analytical tool.<br />Methods: Thirty mandibular incisors with oval-shaped canals were matched based on similar anatomic features of the canal (eg, volume, aspect ratio, and 3-dimensional configuration) after scanning procedures. The canals were prepared with M-Wire Reciproc R25 instruments and filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstanz, Germany) using the continuous wave of condensation technique. Then, the sample was allocated into 3 experimental groups (n = 10) according to the retreatment protocol used: M-Wire Reciproc, Reciproc Blue, and XP-endo Shaper. M-Wire Reciproc R25, Reciproc Blue R25, and XP-endo Shaper instruments were used to remove the root fillings. Apical enlargement was performed with M-Wire Reciproc R40, Reciproc Blue R40, and BioRace BR5 (FKG Dentaire) instruments. Each sample was scanned after each endodontic procedure. The volume of remaining root filling material was quantified before and after apical enlargement. The percentage volumes of root filling reduction in relation to the instrumented canals at both time points (before and after apical enlargement) were calculated and considered for statistical analysis. Data were analyzed statistically with a significance level of 5%.<br />Results: Reciproc Blue presented significantly lower removal of filling material compared with the XP-endo Shaper (Tukey test, P < .05). No difference was detected either between M-Wire Reciproc and Reciproc Blue (Tukey test, P > .05) or M-Wire Reciproc and XP-endo Shaper (Tukey, P > .05). The increase of apical enlargement significantly improved the removal of root fillings from the root canals (P < .05); this effect was similar for all systems (time point × file system, P > .05).<br />Conclusions: The XP-endo Shaper instrument showed a higher percentage of root filling removal, but no differences were observed comparing M-Wire Reciproc with the XP-endo Shaper or Reciproc Blue. The increase of apical enlargement improved the removal of root fillings in all groups. None of them was able to render root canals completely free from root fillings.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1878-3554
Volume :
45
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of endodontics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31350048
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2019.06.003