Back to Search Start Over

First proposal of quality indicators and standards and recommendations to improve the healthcare in the Spanish National Registry of Hip Fracture.

Authors :
Condorhuamán-Alvarado PY
Pareja-Sierra T
Muñoz-Pascual A
Sáez-López P
Ojeda-Thies C
Alarcón-Alarcón T
Cassinello-Ogea MC
Pérez-Castrillón JL
Gómez-Campelo P
Navarro-Castellanos L
Otero-Puime Á
González-Montalvo JI
Source :
Revista espanola de geriatria y gerontologia [Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol] 2019 Sep - Oct; Vol. 54 (5), pp. 257-264. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jul 04.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: The Spanish National Hip Fracture Registry (or Registro Nacional de Fractura de Cadera, RNFC) is a database of hip fracture patients admitted to Spanish hospitals. Its goals include assessment and continuous improvement of the care process.<br />Objectives: To (1) establish a series of indicators, (2) evaluate their initial fulfillment, (3) propose quality standards, (4) suggest recommendations to facilitate standards compliance, and (5) monitor the indicators.<br />Method: The indicators fulfilled the criteria of (1) evaluating the process or outcome, (2) being clinically relevant for patients, (3) being modifiable through changes in healthcare practice, and (4) being considered important by the RNFC participants. The first quartile obtained by the group of hospitals in each of the respective variables was proposed as the standard. The Indicators Advisory Committee (IAC) elaborated a list of recommendations for each indicator, based on the available evidence.<br />Results: Seven indicators were chosen. These indicators (its baseline compliance vs. the standard to be reached, respectively) were: the proportion of patients receiving surgery within 48h (44% vs. 63%), mobilized the first postoperative day (56% vs. 86%), with antiosteoporotic medication at discharge (32% vs. 61%), with calcium supplements at discharge (46% vs. 77%), with vitamin D supplements at discharge (67% vs. 92%), who developed pressure ulcers during hospitalization (7.2% vs. 2.1%) and with independent mobility at 30 days (58% vs. 70%). The IAC has established 25 recommendations for improving care.<br />Conclusion: The indicators and standards chosen are presented, as well as the list of recommendations. This process completes the first step to improve quality of care. The results will be evaluated 6 months after implementing the recommendations.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 SEGG. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1578-1747
Volume :
54
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Revista espanola de geriatria y gerontologia
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31280910
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regg.2019.04.001