Back to Search Start Over

Colonoscopy-Naïve Raters Can Be Trained to Assess Colonoscopy Quality.

Authors :
Keswani RN
Benson M
Beveridge C
Gawron AJ
Gluskin AB
Kahi CJ
Kaltenbach TR
McClure J
Schenck R
Yadlapati RH
Duloy A
Source :
Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association [Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol] 2020 Apr; Vol. 18 (4), pp. 989-991.e1. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jun 20.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

The ability of a colonoscopist to detect colon polyps is commonly measured by the adenoma detection rate (ADR). The outcome of colonoscopy varies based on ADR, and the relationship between decreasing provider ADR and the increased risk of subsequent fatal colorectal cancer has been clearly established. <superscript>1</superscript> Despite the importance of provider ADR, it is of limited value at lower provider volumes due to imprecise measurements. We have previously shown that ratings of colonoscopy inspection quality (CIQ) from video-taped colonoscopies by experts highly correlate with provider ADR, and can provide colonoscopists with specific techniques in need of remediation. <superscript>2</superscript> It is unclear, however, whether these video-based evaluations are a feasible method of assessing colonoscopy quality due to a reliance upon expert evaluations. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether video-based assessments of colonoscopy inspection quality by colonoscopy-naïve raters (novice raters) correlate with assessments by expert raters and with established colonoscopy quality metrics.<br /> (Copyright © 2020 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1542-7714
Volume :
18
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31228569
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2019.06.024