Back to Search Start Over

Anticoagulation therapy patterns for acute treatment of venous thromboembolism in GARFIELD-VTE patients.

Authors :
Haas S
Ageno W
Weitz JI
Goldhaber SZ
Turpie AGG
Goto S
Angchaisuksiri P
Dalsgaard Nielsen J
Kayani G
Zaghdoun A
Farjat AE
Schellong S
Bounameaux H
Mantovani LG
Prandoni P
Kakkar AK
Source :
Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH [J Thromb Haemost] 2019 Oct; Vol. 17 (10), pp. 1694-1706. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jul 23.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Parenteral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have constituted the cornerstone of venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment. Meanwhile, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) provide physicians with an alternative. The Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD (GARFIELD)-VTE observes real-world treatment practices.<br />Objectives: Describe initial anticoagulation (AC) treatment patterns in VTE patients who received parenteral AC, VKAs, and/or DOACs within ±30 days of diagnosis.<br />Methods: VTE patients were categorized into parenteral AC only, parenteral AC with transition to VKA, VKA only, parenteral AC with transition to DOAC, and DOAC only.<br />Results: A total of 9647 patients were initiated on AC treatment alone. 4781 (49.6%) patients received DOACs ± parenteral ACs; 3187 (33.0%), VKA ± parenteral ACs; and 1679 (17.4%) parenteral ACs alone. Rivaroxaban was the most frequently used DOAC (79.4%). DOACs were more frequently used in North America/Australia (58.1%), Europe (52.2%), and Asia (47.6%) than in Latin America (29.7%) and the Middle East/South Africa (32.5%). In patients with suspected VTE, most received parenteral AC monotherapy (67.7%). Patients with deep vein thrombosis were more likely to receive DOACs alone than those with pulmonary embolism with or without deep vein thrombosis (36.2% vs 25.9%). Active cancer patients received parenteral AC alone (58.9%), with 25.5% receiving DOAC ± parenteral AC and 12.8% parenteral AC and VKA. A total of 46.5% of pregnant patients received parenteral AC monotherapy, 34.0% were treated with VKA ± parenteral AC, and 19.5% received a DOAC (± parenteral AC).<br />Conclusion: AC treatment patterns vary by patient population, geographic region and site of VTE. Guidelines for AC therapy are not always adhered to.<br /> (© 2019 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1538-7836
Volume :
17
Issue :
10
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31220403
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.14548