Back to Search
Start Over
Meta-analysis of the Smoker's Paradox in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Receiving Intravenous Thrombolysis or Endovascular Treatment.
- Source :
-
Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco [Nicotine Tob Res] 2019 Aug 19; Vol. 21 (9), pp. 1181-1188. - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Introduction: The existence of the smoker's paradox is controversial and potential mechanisms have not been explained. We aimed to explore the association between cigarette smoking and functional outcome at 3 months in patients with acute ischemic stroke who were treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or endovascular treatment (EVT).<br />Methods: This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Studies exploring the association between smoking and good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≤ 2) following IVT or EVT were searched via the databases of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to August 8, 2018. Information on the characteristics of included studies was independently extracted by two investigators. Data were pooled using a random-effects or fixed-effects meta-analysis according to the heterogeneity of included studies.<br />Results: Among 20 identified studies, 15 reported functional outcomes following IVT, and five reported functional outcomes following EVT. Unadjusted analyses showed that smoking increased the odds of good functional outcomes with a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1.48 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-1.60) after IVT and 2.10 (95% CI: 1.47-3.20) after EVT. Of IVT studies, only eight reported outcomes adjusted for covariates and none of the EVT studies reported adjusted outcomes. After adjustment, the relation between smoking and good functional outcome following IVT lost statistical significance (OR 1.14 [95% CI: 0.81-1.59]).<br />Conclusion: Our meta-analysis suggested that smoking was not associated with good functional outcome (mRS ≤ 2) at 3 months in patients with acute ischemic stroke who were treated with intravenous thrombolysis.<br />Implications: The existence of the smoker's paradox is controversial. A previous letter by Plas et al. published in 2013 reported a positive result for the association between smoking and good functional outcome at 3 months in acute ischemic stroke patients who received intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). However, a major limitation of their meta-analysis was that the process of data synthesis was based on unadjusted data. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the association based on adjusted data and a larger sample size. Our meta-analysis suggested that smoking was not associated with good functional outcome after adjusting for covariates.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Subjects :
- Administration, Intravenous
Brain Ischemia diagnosis
Brain Ischemia epidemiology
Endovascular Procedures trends
Fibrinolytic Agents administration & dosage
Humans
Smokers
Stroke diagnosis
Stroke epidemiology
Thrombolytic Therapy trends
Tobacco Smoking epidemiology
Tobacco Smoking trends
Treatment Outcome
Brain Ischemia drug therapy
Endovascular Procedures methods
Stroke drug therapy
Thrombolytic Therapy methods
Tobacco Smoking drug therapy
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1469-994X
- Volume :
- 21
- Issue :
- 9
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31219582
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntz094