Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of three commonly used CT perfusion software packages in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Authors :
Koopman MS
Berkhemer OA
Geuskens RREG
Emmer BJ
van Walderveen MAA
Jenniskens SFM
van Zwam WH
van Oostenbrugge RJ
van der Lugt A
Dippel DWJ
Beenen LF
Roos YBWEM
Marquering HA
Majoie CBLM
Source :
Journal of neurointerventional surgery [J Neurointerv Surg] 2019 Dec; Vol. 11 (12), pp. 1249-1256. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jun 15.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background and Purpose: CT perfusion (CTP) might support decision making in patients with acute ischemic stroke by providing perfusion maps of ischemic tissue. Currently, the reliability of CTP is hampered by varying results between different post-processing software packages. The purpose of this study is to compare ischemic core volumes estimated by IntelliSpace Portal (ISP) and syngo.via with core volumes as estimated by RAPID.<br />Methods: Thirty-five CTP datasets from patients in the MR CLEAN trial were post-processed. Core volumes were estimated with ISP using default settings and with syngo.via using three different settings: default settings (method A); additional smoothing filter (method B); and adjusted settings (method C). The results were compared with RAPID. Agreement between methods was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Accuracy for detecting volumes up to 25 mL, 50 mL, and 70 mL was assessed. Final infarct volumes were determined on follow-up non-contrast CT.<br />Results: Median core volume was 50 mL with ISP, 41 mL with syngo.via method A, 20 mL with method B, 36 mL with method C, and 11 mL with RAPID. Agreement ranged from poor (ISP: ICC 0.41; method A: ICC 0.23) to good (method B: ICC 0.83; method C: ICC 0.85). The bias (1.8 mL) and limits of agreement (-27, 31 mL) were the smallest with syngo.via with additional smoothing (method B). Agreement for detecting core volumes ≤25 mL with ISP was 54% and 57%, 85% and 74% for syngo.via methods A, B, and C, respectively.<br />Conclusion: Best agreement with RAPID software is provided by syngo.via default settings with additional smoothing. Moreover, this method has the highest agreement in categorizing patients with small core volumes.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: Amsterdam UMC, location AMC received funds from Stryker for consultations by CBLMM, YBWEMR, and OAB. CBLMM received research grants from CVON/Dutch Heart Foundation, European Commission and Twin Foundation. HAM, RREGG, CBLMM, and YBWEMR are shareholders of Nico.lab, a company that focuses on the use of artificial intelligence for medical image analysis. Erasmus MC received funds from Bracco Imaging for consultations by DWJD. Erasmus MC received funds from CVON/Dutch Heart Foundation, European Commission, Stryker, Penumbra, and Medtronic for the execution of stroke trials by DWJD and AvdL. Maastricht University Medical Center received funds from Stryker and Cerenovus for consultations by WHZ.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1759-8486
Volume :
11
Issue :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of neurointerventional surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31203208
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014822