Comparisons of Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Solifenacin versus Tolterodine in Patients with Overactive Bladder: A Meta-Analysis.

Objectives: This meta-analysis was to assess solifenacin and tolterodine in patients with overactive bladder.
Methods: We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CNKI, Wanfang, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The efficacy endpoint was daily micturition frequency, daily urgency episodes, daily incontinence episodes, and micturition volume per voiding. The safety endpoint was the incidence of the rate of major bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and gastrointestinal bleeding.
Results: Seven RCTs met the inclusion criteria and 1,318 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that, compared with tolterodine, solifenacin was associated with similar daily micturition frequency, daily urgency episodes, daily incontinence episode, and micturition volume per voiding at 8 and 12 weeks of follow-up. Moreover, no significant difference was obtained in the incidence of dry mouth between solifenacin and tolterodine at 8 and 12 weeks of follow-up. However, tolterodine decreased the constipation rate at 12 weeks compared with solifenacin.
Conclusion: Solifenacin and tolterodine yielded similar results on daily micturition frequency, daily urgency episodes, daily incontinence episodes, micturition volume per voiding, and the incidence of dry mouth. However, tolterodine can decrease the constipation rate at 12 weeks compared with solifenacin.
(© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.)