Back to Search Start Over

Vitrification of mouse islets of Langerhans: comparison with a more conventional freezing method.

Authors :
Jutte NH
Heyse P
Jansen HG
Bruining GJ
Zeilmaker GH
Source :
Cryobiology [Cryobiology] 1987 Aug; Vol. 24 (4), pp. 292-302.
Publication Year :
1987

Abstract

The possibility of cryopreservation of islets of Langerhans by vitrification using a mixture of cryoprotectants was investigated and the results were compared with a more conventional freezing method using Me2SO as cryoprotectant. Isolated mouse islets were divided into three groups: (1) control islets cultured for 6 days, (2) islets which were cryopreserved by vitrification after 2 days of culture, and (3) islets frozen in 1.5 M Me2SO after 2 days of culture. After warming, islets from groups 2 and 3 were cultured for 4 days. The thus treated islets were investigated with respect to insulin secretion in the presence of 2.5 or 25 mM glucose, survival during postwarming culture, morphology, and capability to reverse streptozotocin-induced diabetes. The insulin secretion in islets from all groups could be stimulated by a factor 5 or more by an increase in the concentration of glucose from 2.5 to 25 mM. The secretion of insulin in the presence of 2.5 mM glucose was similar in all groups of islets. The secretion of insulin in the presence of 25 mM glucose was slightly but not significantly lower in the cryopreserved islets than in the control noncryopreserved islets. The survival of islets during postwarming culture was comparable after cryopreservation with both methods, and islets from both groups could lower serum glucose in streptozotocin diabetic mice. We conclude that islets cryopreserved by the vitrification method are functional in vitro and in vivo. This method is quick, simple, and cheap because the use of complicated freezing equipment is avoided.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0011-2240
Volume :
24
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Cryobiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
3113827
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2240(87)90033-2