Back to Search Start Over

Difference analysis in prevalence of incidental pancreatic cystic lesions between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors :
Zhu S
Wang WT
Shang XS
Ni T
Wu WC
Lou WH
Zeng MS
Rao SX
Source :
BMC medical imaging [BMC Med Imaging] 2019 May 24; Vol. 19 (1), pp. 43. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 May 24.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: The purpose was to investigate the difference of detection rate of incidental pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to compare the difference between CT and MRI and to explore the effect of this difference on surgical resection.<br />Methods: We reviewed the diagnostic reports for incidental PCLs between 2013 and 2016. Images of PCLs would be re-evaluated. Clinical and imaging data were recorded. The chi-square and independent t-test were conducted for categorical and continuous variables.<br />Results: The prevalence of PCLs was 1.91% (1038/54210) and 3.36% (1282/38099) on CT and MRI respectively, and increased with increasing age (P < 0.001). No significant differences were found in the annual prevalence of PCLs on CT (P = 0.796) and MRI (P = 0.213) from 2013 to 2016 while the number of examinations was increasing every year. The annual detection rate of MRI for small PCLs (< 20 mm) was significantly higher than CT (P < 0.001), but was not significantly different for large PCLs (≥20 mm). The rate of surgical resection of PCLs (≥20 mm) in MRI group was higher than CT (55.2% vs. 37.0%, P < 0.001).<br />Conclusions: The detection rate of PCLs on CT and MRI tended to be stable despite increasing scan volumes. Female had a slightly more frequency of PCLs than male. MRI detected more small PCLs(< 20 mm) and had higher impact on surgical resection of large PCL(≥20 mm) compared with CT.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1471-2342
Volume :
19
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMC medical imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31126251
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-019-0341-5