Back to Search
Start Over
Sustained virologic response to direct-acting antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C and hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Source :
-
Journal of hepatology [J Hepatol] 2019 Sep; Vol. 71 (3), pp. 473-485. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 May 13. - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Background & Aims: The effect of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on the response to interferon-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection remains unclear. Using a systematic review and meta-analysis approach, we aimed to investigate the effect of DAA therapy on sustained virologic response (SVR) among patients with CHC and either active, inactive or no HCC.<br />Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 1/1/2013 to 9/24/2018. The pooled SVR rates were computed using DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models.<br />Results: We included 49 studies from 15 countries, comprised of 3,341 patients with HCC and 35,701 without HCC. Overall, the pooled SVR was lower in patients with HCC than in those without HCC (89.6%, 95% CI 86.8-92.1%, I <superscript>2</superscript> = 79.1% vs. 93.3%, 95% CI 91.9-94.7%, I <superscript>2</superscript> = 95.0%, p = 0.0012), translating to a 4.8% (95% CI 0.2-7.4%) SVR reduction by meta-regression analysis. The largest SVR reduction (18.8%) occurred in patients with active/residual HCC vs. inactive/ablated HCC (SVR 73.1% vs. 92.6%, p = 0.002). Meanwhile, patients with HCC who received a prior liver transplant had higher SVR rates than those who did not (p <0.001). Regarding specific DAA regimens, patients with HCC treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir had lower SVR rates than patients without HCC (92.6%, n = 884 vs. 97.8%, n = 13,141, p = 0.026), but heterogeneity was high (I <superscript>2</superscript> = 84.7%, p <0.001). The SVR rate was similar in patients with/without HCC who were treated with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir ± dasabuvir (n = 101) (97.2% vs. 94.8%, p = 0.79), or daclatasvir/asunaprevir (91.7% vs. 89.8%, p = 0.66).<br />Conclusion: Overall, SVR rates were lower in patients with HCC, especially with active HCC, compared to those without HCC, though heterogeneity was high. Continued efforts are needed to aggressively screen, diagnose, and treat HCC to ensure higher CHC cure rates.<br />Lay Summary: There are now medications (direct-acting antivirals or "DAAs") that can "cure" hepatitis C virus, but patients with hepatitis C and liver cancer may be less likely to achieve cure than those without liver cancer. However, patients with liver cancer are also more likely to have advanced liver disease and risk factors that can decrease cure rates, so better controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- 2-Naphthylamine
Adolescent
Adult
Anilides therapeutic use
Benzimidazoles therapeutic use
Carbamates therapeutic use
Cyclopropanes
Female
Fluorenes therapeutic use
Humans
Isoquinolines therapeutic use
Lactams, Macrocyclic
Liver Transplantation
Macrocyclic Compounds therapeutic use
Male
Proline analogs & derivatives
Ritonavir therapeutic use
Sofosbuvir therapeutic use
Sulfonamides therapeutic use
Uracil analogs & derivatives
Uracil therapeutic use
Valine
Young Adult
Antiviral Agents therapeutic use
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular complications
Hepacivirus drug effects
Hepatitis C, Chronic complications
Hepatitis C, Chronic drug therapy
Liver Neoplasms complications
Sustained Virologic Response
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1600-0641
- Volume :
- 71
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of hepatology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31096005
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2019.04.017