Back to Search
Start Over
Parental Refusal of Standard-of-Care Prophylactic Newborn Practices: In One Center's Experience, Many Refuse One but Few Refuse All.
- Source :
-
Hospital pediatrics [Hosp Pediatr] 2019 Jun; Vol. 9 (6), pp. 429-433. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 May 06. - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Objectives: Several interventions to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality are universally recommended: intramuscular (IM) vitamin K (VK), erythromycin ophthalmic prophylaxis, and hepatitis B vaccine for newborns, and maternal pertussis vaccine. Despite robust efficacy and safety evidence, parental refusal of these practices is increasing. We sought to define the current declination rate and characterize the association between declination of 1 intervention and declination of the others.<br />Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed of all inborn singletons admitted to the well newborn nursery over a 12-month period (November 15, 2015 through November 15, 2016) at a large quaternary center.<br />Results: In total, 3758 infants met inclusion criteria. 25% ( n = 921) did not receive at least 1 of the 4 interventions. 13.6% ( n = 511) did not receive the hepatitis B vaccine, 2.3% ( n = 85) did not receive IM VK, 5.9% ( n = 223) did not receive erythromycin, and 7.2% ( n = 271) of mothers did not receive the prenatal tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis vaccine. Odds of refusal of IM VK were 6.2 times greater for infants delivered by a certified nurse midwife versus physician (95% confidence interval 3.3-11.6). Pattern of declination was variable; of 921 mother-infant dyads who did not receive at least 1 intervention, only 2 dyads received none of the interventions.<br />Conclusions: Our study is one of the first in which patterns of refusal of standard-of-care perinatal practices are characterized. Alarmingly, one-fourth of our cohort did not receive at least 1 core infant health intervention. Our finding of only modest overlap in declination of each intervention carries implications for the development of targeted interventions.<br />Competing Interests: POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Female
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Male
Nurseries, Infant statistics & numerical data
Retrospective Studies
Vaccination Refusal psychology
Vaccination Refusal statistics & numerical data
Chemoprevention methods
Chemoprevention psychology
Chemoprevention statistics & numerical data
Infant Care methods
Infant Care statistics & numerical data
Parents psychology
Treatment Refusal psychology
Treatment Refusal statistics & numerical data
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2154-1671
- Volume :
- 9
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Hospital pediatrics
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31061136
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1542/hpeds.2019-0029