Back to Search Start Over

Fate of atmospherically deposited NH 4 + and NO 3 - in two temperate forests in China: temporal pattern and redistribution.

Authors :
Li S
Gurmesa GA
Zhu W
Gundersen P
Zhang S
Xi D
Huang S
Wang A
Zhu F
Jiang Y
Zhu J
Fang Y
Source :
Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America [Ecol Appl] 2019 Sep; Vol. 29 (6), pp. e01920. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 May 29.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

The impacts of anthropogenic nitrogen (N) deposition on forest ecosystems depend in large part on its fate. However, our understanding of the fates of different forms of deposited N as well as the redistribution over time within different ecosystems is limited. In this study, we used the <superscript>15</superscript> N-tracer method to investigate both the short-term (1 week to 3 months) and long-term (1-3 yr) fates of deposited NH <subscript>4</subscript> <superscript>+</superscript> or NO <subscript>3</subscript> <superscript>-</superscript> by following the recovery of the <superscript>15</superscript> N in different ecosystem compartments in a larch plantation forest and a mixed forest located in northeastern China. The results showed similar total ecosystem retention for deposited NH <subscript>4</subscript> <superscript>+</superscript> and NO <subscript>3</subscript> <superscript>-</superscript> , but their distribution within the ecosystems (plants vs. soil) differed distinctly particularly in the short-term, with higher <superscript>15</superscript> NO <subscript>3</subscript> <superscript>-</superscript> recoveries in plants (while lower recoveries in organic layer) than found for <superscript>15</superscript> NH <subscript>4</subscript> <superscript>+</superscript> . The different short-term fate was likely related to the higher mobility of <superscript>15</superscript> NO <subscript>3</subscript> <superscript>-</superscript> than <superscript>15</superscript> NH <subscript>4</subscript> <superscript>+</superscript> in soils instead of plant uptake preferences for NO <subscript>3</subscript> <superscript>-</superscript> over NH <subscript>4</subscript> <superscript>+</superscript> . In the long-term, differences between N forms became less prevalent but higher recoveries in trees (particularly in the larch forest) of <superscript>15</superscript> NO <subscript>3</subscript> <superscript>-</superscript> than <superscript>15</superscript> NH <subscript>4</subscript> <superscript>+</superscript> tracer persisted, suggesting that incoming NO <subscript>3</subscript> <superscript>-</superscript> may contribute more to plant biomass increment and forest carbon sequestration than incoming NH <subscript>4</subscript> <superscript>+</superscript> . Differences between the two forests in recoveries were largely driven by a higher <superscript>15</superscript> N recovery in the organic layer (both N forms) and in trees (for <superscript>15</superscript> NO <subscript>3</subscript> <superscript>-</superscript> ) in the larch forest compared to the mixed forest. This was due to a more abundant organic layer and possibly higher tree N demand in the larch forest than in the mixed forest. Leachate <superscript>15</superscript> N loss was minor (<1% of the added <superscript>15</superscript> N) for both N forms and in both forests. Total <superscript>15</superscript> N recovery averaged 78% in the short-term and decreased to 55% in the long-term but with increasing amount of <superscript>15</superscript> N label (re)-redistributed into slow turn-over pools (e.g., trees and mineral soil). The different retention dynamics of deposited NH <subscript>4</subscript> <superscript>+</superscript> and NO <subscript>3</subscript> <superscript>-</superscript> may have implications in environmental policy related to the anthropogenic emissions of the two N forms.<br /> (© 2019 by the Ecological Society of America.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1051-0761
Volume :
29
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31058370
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1920