Back to Search Start Over

A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task.

Authors :
Verbruggen F
Aron AR
Band GP
Beste C
Bissett PG
Brockett AT
Brown JW
Chamberlain SR
Chambers CD
Colonius H
Colzato LS
Corneil BD
Coxon JP
Dupuis A
Eagle DM
Garavan H
Greenhouse I
Heathcote A
Huster RJ
Jahfari S
Kenemans JL
Leunissen I
Li CR
Logan GD
Matzke D
Morein-Zamir S
Murthy A
Paré M
Poldrack RA
Ridderinkhof KR
Robbins TW
Roesch M
Rubia K
Schachar RJ
Schall JD
Stock AK
Swann NC
Thakkar KN
van der Molen MW
Vermeylen L
Vink M
Wessel JR
Whelan R
Zandbelt BB
Boehler CN
Source :
ELife [Elife] 2019 Apr 29; Vol. 8. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Apr 29.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Response inhibition is essential for navigating everyday life. Its derailment is considered integral to numerous neurological and psychiatric disorders, and more generally, to a wide range of behavioral and health problems. Response-inhibition efficiency furthermore correlates with treatment outcome in some of these conditions. The stop-signal task is an essential tool to determine how quickly response inhibition is implemented. Despite its apparent simplicity, there are many features (ranging from task design to data analysis) that vary across studies in ways that can easily compromise the validity of the obtained results. Our goal is to facilitate a more accurate use of the stop-signal task. To this end, we provide 12 easy-to-implement consensus recommendations and point out the problems that can arise when they are not followed. Furthermore, we provide user-friendly open-source resources intended to inform statistical-power considerations, facilitate the correct implementation of the task, and assist in proper data analysis.<br />Competing Interests: FV, GB, PB, AB, JB, CC, HC, LC, BC, JC, AD, DE, HG, IG, AH, RH, SJ, JK, IL, CL, GL, DM, SM, AM, MP, RP, KR, MR, JS, AS, KT, Mv, LV, MV, JW, RW, BZ, CB No competing interests declared, AA, NS Reviewing editor, eLife, CB has received payment for consulting and speaker's honoraria from GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Genzyme, and Teva. He has recent research grants with Novartis and Genzyme, SC consults for Shire, Ieso Digital Health, Cambridge Cognition, and Promentis. Dr Chamberlain's research is funded by Wellcome Trust (110049/Z/15/Z), TR consults for Cambridge Cognition, Mundipharma and Unilever. He receives royalties from Cambridge Cognition (CANTAB) and has recent research grants with Shionogi and SmallPharma, KR has received speaker's honoraria and grants for other projects from Eli Lilly and Shire, RS has consulted to Highland Therapeutics, Eli Lilly and Co., and Purdue Pharma. He has commercial interest in a cognitive rehabilitation software company, eHave<br /> (© 2019, Verbruggen et al.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2050-084X
Volume :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
ELife
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31033438
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46323