Back to Search
Start Over
Single Sessions of High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Do Not Alter Lower Extremity Biomechanical or Corticomotor Response Variables Post-stroke.
- Source :
-
Frontiers in neuroscience [Front Neurosci] 2019 Apr 11; Vol. 13, pp. 286. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Apr 11 (Print Publication: 2019). - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique used to modulate cortical activity. However, measured effects on clinically relevant assessments have been inconsistent, possibly due to the non-focal dispersion of current from traditional two electrode configurations. High-definition (HD)-tDCS uses a small array of electrodes ( N = 5) to improve targeted current delivery. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of a single session of anodal and cathodal HD-tDCS on gait kinematics and kinetics and the corticomotor response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in individuals post-stroke. We hypothesized that ipsilesional anodal stimulation would increase the corticomotor response to TMS leading to beneficial changes in gait. Eighteen participants post-stroke (average age: 64.8 years, SD : 12.5; average months post-stroke: 54, SD : 42; average lower extremity Fugl-Meyer score: 26, SD : 6) underwent biomechanical and corticomotor response testing on three separate occasions prior to and after HD-tDCS stimulation. In a randomized order, anodal, cathodal, and sham HD-tDCS were applied to the ipsilesional motor cortex for 20 min while participants pedaled on a recumbent cycle ergometer. Gait kinetic and kinematic data were collected while walking on an instrumented split-belt treadmill with motion capture. The corticomotor response of the paretic and non-paretic tibialis anterior (TA) muscles were measured using neuronavigated TMS. Repeated measures ANOVAs using within-subject factors of time point (pre, post) and stimulation type (sham, anodal, cathodal) were used to compare effects of HD-tDCS stimulation on measured variables. HD-tDCS had no effect on over ground walking speed ( P > 0.41), or kinematic variables ( P > 0.54). The corticomotor responses of the TA muscles were also unaffected by HD-tDCS (resting motor threshold, P = 0.15; motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, P = 0.25; MEP normalized latency, P = 0.66). A single session of anodal or cathodal HD-tDCS delivered to a standardized ipsilesional area of the motor cortex does not appear to alter gait kinematics or corticomotor response post-stroke. Repeated sessions and individualized delivery of HD-tDCS may be required to induce beneficial plastic effects. Contralesional stimulation should also be investigated due to the altered interactions between the cerebral hemispheres post-stroke.
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1662-4548
- Volume :
- 13
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Frontiers in neuroscience
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31031579
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00286