Back to Search Start Over

The Benefits of Parenteral Nutrition (PN) Versus Enteral Nutrition (EN) Among Adult Critically Ill Patients: What is the Evidence? A Literature Review.

Authors :
Cadena AJ
Habib S
Rincon F
Dobak S
Source :
Journal of intensive care medicine [J Intensive Care Med] 2020 Jul; Vol. 35 (7), pp. 615-626. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Apr 28.
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Malnutrition is frequently seen among patients in the intensive care unit. Evidence shows that optimal nutritional support can lead to better clinical outcomes. Recent clinical trials debate over the efficacy of enteral nutrition (EN) over parenteral nutrition (PN). Multiple trials have studied the impact of EN versus PN in terms of health-care cost and clinical outcomes (including functional status, cost, infectious complications, mortality risk, length of hospital and intensive care unit stay, and mechanical ventilation duration). The aim of this review is to address the question: In critically ill adult patients requiring nutrition support, does EN compared to PN favorably impact clinical outcomes and health-care costs?

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1525-1489
Volume :
35
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of intensive care medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31030601
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066619843782