Back to Search
Start Over
The Benefits of Parenteral Nutrition (PN) Versus Enteral Nutrition (EN) Among Adult Critically Ill Patients: What is the Evidence? A Literature Review.
- Source :
-
Journal of intensive care medicine [J Intensive Care Med] 2020 Jul; Vol. 35 (7), pp. 615-626. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Apr 28. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Malnutrition is frequently seen among patients in the intensive care unit. Evidence shows that optimal nutritional support can lead to better clinical outcomes. Recent clinical trials debate over the efficacy of enteral nutrition (EN) over parenteral nutrition (PN). Multiple trials have studied the impact of EN versus PN in terms of health-care cost and clinical outcomes (including functional status, cost, infectious complications, mortality risk, length of hospital and intensive care unit stay, and mechanical ventilation duration). The aim of this review is to address the question: In critically ill adult patients requiring nutrition support, does EN compared to PN favorably impact clinical outcomes and health-care costs?
- Subjects :
- Adult
Critical Care economics
Critical Care Outcomes
Critical Illness economics
Critical Illness therapy
Enteral Nutrition economics
Female
Humans
Intensive Care Units
Male
Malnutrition economics
Meta-Analysis as Topic
Observational Studies as Topic
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Review Literature as Topic
Critical Care statistics & numerical data
Enteral Nutrition statistics & numerical data
Health Care Costs statistics & numerical data
Malnutrition therapy
Parenteral Nutrition statistics & numerical data
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1525-1489
- Volume :
- 35
- Issue :
- 7
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of intensive care medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31030601
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066619843782