Back to Search Start Over

Microdermal Implants Show No Effect on Surrounding Tissue During Surgery With Electrocautery.

Authors :
Sheldon RR
Loughren MJ
Marenco CW
Winters JR
Bingham JR
Martin MJ
Eckert MJ
Burney RO
Source :
The Journal of surgical research [J Surg Res] 2019 Sep; Vol. 241, pp. 72-77. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Apr 19.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Microdermal implants are an increasingly popular form of body jewelry. The potential for electrical conduction burn at the site of metal jewelry left in situ during electrosurgery has prompted surgical societies to recommend routine removal before surgery. To date, however, there is a lack of evidence to support this practice. We assessed in vivo thermal effect and tissue damage around implants during and after electrocautery.<br />Materials and Methods: Stainless steel microdermal anchors were surgically implanted into four swine. After allowing for initial healing, negative controls were excised and evaluated. An electrocautery grounding pad was placed 2 cm caudal to the implant. Continuous electrocautery (coagulation/30 W) for 30 s was applied to the skin 2 cm cranial to the implant. Surface skin temperature was recorded during electrocautery using thermal imaging. Tissue damage was assessed by gross examination and histologic evaluation. The same procedure was then performed to the contralateral nonimplanted side as a sham control.<br />Results: Electrocoagulation raised skin temperature around the electrocautery tip 27.7°C (T <subscript>max</subscript> 64.8°C). Skin temperature around the dermal implant rose 1.58°C (T <subscript>max</subscript> 38.6°C) compared with 2.03°C (T <subscript>max</subscript> 39.2°C) in the nonimplanted control skin (P = 0.627). Skin temperatures at implanted and control sites showed no statistical difference at any recorded time interval. Histologic review of excised tissue samples showed no evidence of thermal injury.<br />Conclusions: Metallic implants appear to have no effect on skin temperature during the use of electrocautery even when in close proximity to both the electrocautery pen and return pad. Aggressive steps to remove microdermal implants before surgery may be unnecessary.<br /> (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1095-8673
Volume :
241
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Journal of surgical research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
31009888
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.03.039