Back to Search
Start Over
Complete Revascularization Versus Culprit Lesion Only in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: A DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Substudy.
- Source :
-
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions [JACC Cardiovasc Interv] 2019 Apr 22; Vol. 12 (8), pp. 721-730. - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided revascularization compared with culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) on infarct size, left ventricular (LV), function, LV remodeling, and the presence of nonculprit infarctions.<br />Background: Patients with STEMI with multivessel disease might have improved clinical outcomes after complete revascularization compared with PCI of the infarct-related artery only, but the impact on infarct size, LV function, and remodeling as well as the risk for periprocedural infarction are unknown.<br />Methods: In this substudy of the DANAMI-3 (Third Danish Trial in Acute Myocardial Infarction)-PRIMULTI (Primary PCI in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: Treatment of Culprit Lesion Only or Complete Revascularization) randomized trial, patients with STEMI with multivessel disease were randomized to receive either complete FFR-guided revascularization or PCI of the culprit vessel only. The patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging during index admission and at 3-month follow-up.<br />Results: A total of 280 patients (136 patients with infarct-related and 144 with complete FFR-guided revascularization) were included. There were no differences in final infarct size (median 12% [interquartile range: 5% to 19%] vs. 11% [interquartile range: 4% to 18%]; p = 0.62), myocardial salvage index (median 0.71 [interquartile range: 0.54 to 0.89] vs. 0.66 [interquartile range: 0.55 to 0.87]; p = 0.49), LV ejection fraction (mean 58 ± 9% vs. 59 ± 9%; p = 0.39), and LV end-systolic volume remodeling (mean 7 ± 22 ml vs. 7 ± 19 ml; p = 0.63). New nonculprit infarction occurring after the nonculprit intervention was numerically more frequent among patients treated with complete revascularization (6 [4.5%] vs. 1 [0.8%]; p = 0.12).<br />Conclusions: Complete FFR-guided revascularization in patients with STEMI and multivessel disease did not affect final infarct size, LV function, or remodeling compared with culprit-only PCI.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Aged
Coronary Angiography
Coronary Artery Disease diagnostic imaging
Coronary Artery Disease mortality
Coronary Artery Disease physiopathology
Denmark
Female
Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Predictive Value of Tests
Recovery of Function
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction diagnostic imaging
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction mortality
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction physiopathology
Stroke Volume
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Function, Left
Ventricular Remodeling
Coronary Artery Disease therapy
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention adverse effects
ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction therapy
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1876-7605
- Volume :
- 12
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 31000010
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.01.248