Back to Search Start Over

[Early functional recovery of direct anterior approach versus anterolateral approach for total hip arthroplasty].

Authors :
Li SL
Yang XT
Tian XB
Sun L
Source :
Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences [Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban] 2019 Apr 18; Vol. 51 (2), pp. 268-272.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the early clinical effects of direct anterior approach (DAA) versus anterolateral approach (ALA) on safety and functional recovery following total hip arthroplasty (THA).<br />Methods: Between January 2015 and May 2016, a randomized clinical trial was performed at Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital. A total of 50 patients who underwent THA were allocated for either the DAA (n=25) or ALA (n=25). DDA group had 25 patients (25 hips), including 16 males and 9 females, with the mean age of (62±2) years, BMI of (23.26 ±4.95) kg/m <superscript>2</superscript> (range: 19.6 to 29.5), and preoperative Harris score of (33.4 ±15.5) (range: 17.9 to 48.9). Eleven cases were diagnosed as primarily hip osteoarthritis, 4 were developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH, Crowe 2) and 10 were hip avascular necrosis (AVN, Stages 3 to 4). ALA group had 25 patients (25 hips), including 18 males and 7 females, with the mean age of (59±3) years, BMI of (25.35 ±5.8) kg/m <superscript>2</superscript> (range: 18.2 to 29.8), and preoperative Harris score of (38.6 ± 16.7) (range: 23.1 to 56.5). Ten cases were diagnosed as primarily hip osteoarthritis, 3 were developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH, Crowe 2) and 12 were hip avascular necrosis (AVN, Stages 3 to 4). Operation time, incision length, intra-operative blood loss and functional recovery of hip postoperatively were compared between the two groups.<br />Results: The surgical incision of both groups were stage I healing. The mean follow-up was 6 months. There was no significant difference regarding operation time, incision length, and intra-operative blood loss between the two groups. However, we also found that there was no significant difference in the Harris score 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. In addition, two patients in ALA group suffered claudication (physical examination: abduction dysfunction of hip). We also found that DAA group resulted in better recovery of abductor strength and gait than ALA group during early follow-up.<br />Conclusion: Both DAA and ALA could obtain good results of early curative effect following THA. Moreover, DAA resulted in better gait than ALA during early follow-up.

Details

Language :
Chinese
ISSN :
1671-167X
Volume :
51
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30996366