Back to Search Start Over

[Effects of water-fertilizer integration on water use and photosynthetic characteristics of winter wheat].

Authors :
Guo PW
Zhao JY
Shi Y
Yu ZW
Source :
Ying yong sheng tai xue bao = The journal of applied ecology [Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao] 2019 Apr; Vol. 30 (4), pp. 1170-1178.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

In two growing seasons of wheat (2016-2018), a field trial with Jimai 22 as test mate-rial was conducted in Shijiawangzi Village, Yanzhou City, Shandong Province. Under three nitrogen levels of 150 (N <subscript>1</subscript> ), 180 (N <subscript>2</subscript> ) and 210 (N <subscript>3</subscript> ) kg·hm <superscript>-2</superscript> , two irrigation-fertilization methods were designed at jointing as border irrigation and broadcasting of fertilizer (W <subscript>1</subscript> ), micro spraying irrigation and water-fertilizer integration (W <subscript>2</subscript> ), to examine the effects of irrigation-fertilization methods on water use, photosynthetic characteristics, and dry matter accumulation and transport of wheat. The results showed that under the same nitrogen level, seven days average soil evaporation of W <subscript>2</subscript> treatment in filling period was significantly lower than that of W <subscript>1</subscript> treatment, and that soil water consumption in the 60-160 cm soil layer was significantly higher than that in W <subscript>1</subscript> treatment. The flag leaf net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate of W <subscript>2</subscript> treatment were signi-ficantly higher than W <subscript>1</subscript> treatment from 14 to 28 days after anthesis. The amount of dry matter in anthesis and maturity stage and the allocation to grain of post-anthesis assimilates of W <subscript>2</subscript> treatment were significantly higher than those in W <subscript>1</subscript> treatment. There was no difference in total water consumption between W <subscript>2</subscript> and W <subscript>1</subscript> treatments. Grain yield, water use efficiency and nitrogen use efficiency of W <subscript>2</subscript> treatment were significantly higher than W <subscript>1</subscript> treatment. The highest grain yield, water use efficiency and nitrogen use efficiency were obtained at the nitrogen level of 210 kg·hm <superscript>-2</superscript> . By comprehensive considerations, under the same nitrogen level, treatment of micro spraying irrigation and water-fertilizer integration was better than border irrigation and broadcasting of fertilizer. The W <subscript>2</subscript> N <subscript>3</subscript> treatment under the nitrogen level of 210 kg·hm <superscript>-2</superscript> and with the application of micro spraying irrigation and water-fertilizer integration at jointing was the optimal treatment to save water and fertilizer.

Details

Language :
Chinese
ISSN :
1001-9332
Volume :
30
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Ying yong sheng tai xue bao = The journal of applied ecology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30994277
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.201904.010