Back to Search
Start Over
Two-year safety evaluation of a biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with increased drug elution and polymer absorption kinetics in complex patient and lesion cohort.
- Source :
-
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions [Catheter Cardiovasc Interv] 2020 Feb; Vol. 95 (2), pp. 206-215. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Apr 16. - Publication Year :
- 2020
-
Abstract
- Objectives: The aim of the present report was to compare 2-year safety outcomes of two biodegradable polymer (BP) sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) with different drug eluting and polymer absorption kinetics in a subgroup of complex patients and lesions.<br />Background: The previously published PANDA III study showed the BuMA BP SES, with faster drug elution and polymer absorption, was non-inferior to the Excel SES in target lesion failure (TLF).<br />Methods: In PANDA III trial, patients who fulfilled one or more of the following criteria were included: Small vessel disease (reference vessel diameter ≤ 2.5 mm); long lesion (lesion length ≥ 20 mm); chronic total occlusion lesion; and diabetic patients.<br />Results: Among 2,348 patients randomly assigned to treatment with BuMA (n = 1,174) or Excel SES (n = 1,174) in the PANDA III study, 858 in the BuMA group and 855 in the Excel group satisfied the inclusion criteria. At 2-year follow-up, the incidence of definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST) was significantly lower with BuMA SES as compared with Excel SES (0.7% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.03). This difference was mainly caused by decreased subacute stent thrombosis rate (0% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.03). In patients who did not fulfill the complex patient and lesion criteria, there were no between-group difference in ST (0.7% vs. 0%, p = 0.50). Myocardial infarction and TLF rates were similar (5.7% vs. 6.0%, p = 0.79 and 8.8% vs. 7.5%, p = 0.34, respectively), whereas patient-oriented composite endpoint was higher with BuMA SES mainly due to high risk of revascularization (15.6% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.01; 8.4% vs. 4.6%, p < 0.01).<br />Conclusions: Two-year subgroup analysis of the all-comer PANDA III trial revealed the increased safety benefit of the BuMA SES is more prominently seen in complex patient and lesion population.<br />Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrial.gov, Identifier-NCT02017275.<br /> (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)
- Subjects :
- Absorption, Physicochemical
Acute Coronary Syndrome diagnostic imaging
Cardiovascular Agents adverse effects
China
Coronary Artery Disease diagnostic imaging
Coronary Thrombosis etiology
Humans
Kinetics
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention adverse effects
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis Design
Recurrence
Risk Factors
Sirolimus adverse effects
Treatment Outcome
Acute Coronary Syndrome therapy
Cardiovascular Agents administration & dosage
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
Coronary Artery Disease therapy
Drug-Eluting Stents
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention instrumentation
Polyesters chemistry
Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer chemistry
Sirolimus administration & dosage
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1522-726X
- Volume :
- 95
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 30990245
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28288