Back to Search Start Over

Safety of Dynamic Intravenous Iron Administration Strategies in Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors :
Li X
Cole SR
Kshirsagar AV
Fine JP
Stürmer T
Brookhart MA
Source :
Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN [Clin J Am Soc Nephrol] 2019 May 07; Vol. 14 (5), pp. 728-737. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Apr 15.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Intravenous iron therapy for chronic anemia management is largely driven by dosing protocols that differ in intensity with respect to dosing approach ( i.e. , dose, frequency, and duration). Little is known about the safety of these protocols.<br />Design, Setting, Participants, & Measurements: Using clinical data from a large United States dialysis provider linked to health care utilization data from Medicare, we constructed a cohort of patients with ESKD aged ≥65 years who initiated and continued center-based hemodialysis for ≥90 days between 2009 and 2012, and initiated at least one of the five common intravenous iron administration strategies; ranked by intensity (the amount of iron given at moderate-to-high iron indices), the order of strategies was 3 (least intensive), 2 (less intensive), 1 (reference), 4 (more intensive), and 5 (most intensive). We estimated the effect of continuous exposure to these strategies on cumulative risks of mortality and infection-related events with dynamic Cox marginal structural models.<br />Results: Of 13,249 eligible patients, 1320 (10%) died and 1627 (12%) had one or more infection-related events during the 4-month follow-up. The most and least commonly initiated strategy was strategy 2 and 5, respectively. Compared with the reference strategy 1, more intensive strategies (4 and 5) demonstrated a higher risk of all-cause mortality ( e.g. , most intensive strategy 5: 60-day risk difference: 1.3%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.8% to 2.1%; 120-day risk difference: 3.1%; 95% CI, 1.0% to 5.6%). Similarly, higher risks were observed for infection-related morbidity and mortality among more intensive strategies ( e.g. , strategy 5: 60-day risk difference: 1.8%; 95% CI, 1.2% to 2.6%; 120-day risk difference: 4.3%; 95% CI, 2.2% to 6.8%). Less intensive strategies (2 and 3) demonstrated lower risks of all-cause mortality and infection-related events.<br />Conclusions: Among dialysis patients surviving 90 days, subsequent intravenous iron administration strategies promoting more intensive iron treatment at moderate-to-high iron indices levels are associated with higher risks of mortality and infection-related events.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1555-905X
Volume :
14
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30988164
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.03970318