Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of titer results obtained using immediate spin one-dilution techniques to a reference method.

Authors :
Yazer MH
Dunbar NM
Bub CB
Condict BE
Dunn R
Janoušková M
Kutner J
Landová L
Lejdarová H
Nesvačilová B
Pacasová R
Procházková R
Řehořová L
Raval JS
Ziman A
Bohonĕk M
Source :
Transfusion [Transfusion] 2019 Apr; Vol. 59 (S2), pp. 1512-1517.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Many transfusion services determine the titer of potentially incompatible plasma-containing products by performing a one-dilution titer at their selected titer threshold. This study compared the results of immediate spin (IS) one-dilution titers determined by three methods with a reference standard method.<br />Methods: Plasma-containing products from group A and O donors were titered using the participant's routine IS one-dilution titer method. No time or temperature incubations were performed, and antihuman globulin reagent was not used. The samples were then tested using a reference method, which was a saline tube test with a 1-hour room temperature incubation; antihuman globulin was not used in the reference method. The results of the one-dilution titer were then compared to that obtained in the reference method.<br />Results: Nine centers participated in this study. There were 698 antibodies from 374 units tested by the manual IS tube one-dilution titer method; sensitivity was 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.92), and specificity was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.98-1.00). There were 412 antibodies from 206 units tested by the manual and automated IS buffered gel card one-dilution titer method; sensitivity was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98), and specificity was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.81-0.91). There were 98 antibodies from 49 units tested by an automated microplate IS one-dilution titer method; sensitivity was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.71-0.93), and specificity was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.92-0.99). All three methods had an accuracy rate of 90% or greater.<br />Conclusion: The manual and automated one-dilution titer methods are suitable for screening plasma-containing units, although more evaluation of the automated microplate method might be required.<br /> (© 2019 AABB.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1537-2995
Volume :
59
Issue :
S2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Transfusion
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30980760
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.15170