Back to Search Start Over

A randomized trial of human C1 inhibitor prophylaxis in children with hereditary angioedema.

Authors :
Aygören-Pürsün E
Soteres DF
Nieto-Martinez SA
Christensen J
Jacobson KW
Moldovan D
Van Leerberghe A
Tang Y
Lu P
Vardi M
Schranz J
Martinez-Saguer I
Source :
Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology [Pediatr Allergy Immunol] 2019 Aug; Vol. 30 (5), pp. 553-561. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 May 29.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Patients with hereditary angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency or dysfunction have burdensome recurrent angioedema attacks. The safety, efficacy, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes of C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) prophylaxis (intravenously administered) in patients aged 6-11 years were investigated.<br />Methods: Eligible patients were enrolled in a randomized, single-blind, crossover, phase 3 trial. After a 12-week baseline observation period (BOP), patients received 500 or 1000 U C1-INH, twice weekly, for 12 weeks before crossing over to the alternate dose for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end-point was the monthly normalized number of angioedema attacks (NNA). HRQoL was assessed using the EuroQoL 5-dimensional descriptive system youth version and visual analog scale (EQ-VAS).<br />Results: Twelve randomized patients had a median (range) age of 10.0 (7-11) years. Mean (SD) percentage reduction in monthly NNA from BOP was 71.1% (27.1%) with 500 U and 84.5% (20.0%) with 1000 U C1-INH. Mean (SD) within-patient difference (-0.4 [0.58]) for monthly NNA with both doses was significant (P = 0.035 [90% CI, -0.706 to -0.102]). Cumulative attack severity, cumulative daily severity, and number of acute attacks treated were reduced. No serious adverse events or discontinuations occurred. Mean EQ-VAS change from BOP to week 9 of treatment (500 U C1-INH, 10.4; 1000 U C1-INH, 21.6) was greater than the minimal important difference, indicating a meaningful HRQoL change.<br />Conclusions: C1-INH prophylaxis was effective, safe, and well tolerated in children aged 6-11 years experiencing recurrent angioedema attacks. A post hoc analysis indicated a meaningful improvement in HRQoL with C1-INH.<br />Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02052141.<br /> (© 2019 The Authors. Pediatric Allergy and Immunology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1399-3038
Volume :
30
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30968444
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/pai.13060