Back to Search Start Over

Estimating the impact of deploying an electronic clinical decision support tool as part of a national practice improvement project.

Authors :
Kerns EK
Staggs VS
Fouquet SD
McCulloh RJ
Source :
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA [J Am Med Inform Assoc] 2019 Jul 01; Vol. 26 (7), pp. 630-636.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Objective: Estimate the impact on clinical practice of using a mobile device-based electronic clinical decision support (mECDS) tool within a national standardization project.<br />Materials and Methods: An mECDS tool (app) was released as part of a change package to provide febrile infant management guidance to clinicians. App usage was analyzed using 2 measures: metric hits per case (metric-related screen view count divided by site-reported febrile infant cases in each designated market area [DMA] monthly) and cumulative prior metric hits per site (DMA metric hits summed from study month 1 until the month preceding the index, divided by sites in the DMA). For each metric, a mixed logistic regression model was fit to model site performance as a function of app usage.<br />Results: An increase of 200 cumulative prior metric hits per site was associated with increased odds of adherence to 3 metrics: appropriate admission (odds ratio [OR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.18), appropriate length of stay (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.12-1.28), and inappropriate chest x-ray (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.75-0.91). Ten additional metric hits per case were also associated: OR were 1.18 (95% CI, 1.02-1.36), 1.36 (95% CI, 1.14-1.62), and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.62-0.89).<br />Discussion: mECDS tools are increasingly being implemented, but their impact on clinical practice is poorly described. To our knowledge, although ecologic in nature, this report is the first to link clinical practice to mECDS use on a national scale and outside of an electronic health record.<br />Conclusions: mECDS use was associated with changes in adherence to targeted metrics. Future studies should seek to link mECDS usage more directly to clinical practice and assess other site-level factors.<br /> (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1527-974X
Volume :
26
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30925592
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz011