Back to Search Start Over

Severity of Substance Use Disorder: Utility as an Outcome in Clinical Settings.

Authors :
Dacosta-Sánchez D
Fernández-Calderón F
González-Ponce B
Díaz-Batanero C
Lozano ÓM
Source :
Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research [Alcohol Clin Exp Res] 2019 May; Vol. 43 (5), pp. 869-876. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Mar 29.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Some authors have pointed out the usefulness of the levels of substance use disorder (SUD) as a treatment outcome. However, in order to use this variable as an outcome measure, its impact needs to be addressed within a clinical context. The aim of this study was to analyze the sensitivity of SUD levels as a measure for detecting reliable changes and to make a comparison between the changes in SUD levels detected when using the number of criteria fulfilled and when using the reliable change index (RCI).<br />Methods: The sample consisted of 206 (106 in follow-up) patients diagnosed with abuse/dependence on alcohol and cocaine, according to DSM-IV criteria. The Substance Dependence Severity Scale for DSM-5 was used to determine current alcohol use disorder (AUD) and cocaine use disorder (CUD). Number of DSM-5 criteria fulfilled and RCI were used to determine the change in SUD levels.<br />Results: No association was found between adherence to/abandonment of treatment and AUD severity levels (χ <superscript>2</superscript>  = 7.029, p = 0.071) or CUD severity levels (χ <superscript>2</superscript>  = 2.044, p = 0.413). Statistical significant differences for levels of AUD (z = -3.870, p = 0.000) and CUD (z = -5.382, p = 0.000) were found between baseline assessment and follow-up. According to the number of DSM-5 criteria and RCI, the Kappa coefficient for the change in patient status (improved, worsened, or no change) was k = 0.61 for alcohol patients and k = 0.64 for cocaine patients. The "mild" category showed the greatest inconsistency between both procedures.<br />Conclusions: Levels of SUD are sensitive to the impact of treatment as measured by the difference between the baseline assessment and 3-month follow-up. However, conclusions differ according to whether the DSM-5 criteria or the RCI is applied.<br /> (© 2019 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1530-0277
Volume :
43
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30861142
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.14020