Back to Search Start Over

Assessment of Simplified Methods for Quantification of 18 F-FDHT Uptake in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors :
Kramer GM
Yaqub M
Vargas HA
Schuit RC
Windhorst AD
van den Eertwegh AJM
van der Veldt AAM
Bergman AM
Burnazi EM
Lewis JS
Chua S
Staton KD
Beattie BJ
Humm JL
Davis ID
Weickhardt AJ
Scott AM
Morris MJ
Hoekstra OS
Lammertsma AA
Source :
Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine [J Nucl Med] 2019 Sep; Vol. 60 (9), pp. 1221-1227. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Mar 08.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

<superscript>18</superscript> F-fluorodihydrotestosterone ( <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDHT) PET/CT potentially provides a noninvasive method for assessment of androgen receptor expression in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The objective of this study was to assess simplified methods for quantifying <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDHT uptake in mCRPC patients and to assess effects of tumor perfusion on these <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDHT uptake metrics. Methods: Seventeen mCRPC patients were included in this prospective observational multicenter study. Test and retest 30-min dynamic <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDHT PET/CT scans with venous blood sampling were performed in 14 patients. In addition, arterial blood sampling and dynamic <superscript>15</superscript> O-H <subscript>2</subscript> O scans were obtained in a subset of 6 patients. Several simplified methods were assessed: Patlak plots; SUV normalized to body weight (SUV <subscript>BW</subscript> ), lean body mass (SUV <subscript>LBM</subscript> ), whole blood (SUV <subscript>WB</subscript> ), parent plasma activity concentration (SUV <subscript>PP</subscript> ), area under the parent plasma curve (SUV <subscript>AUC,PP</subscript> ), and area under the whole-blood input curve (SUV <subscript>AUC,WB</subscript> ); and SUV <subscript>BW</subscript> corrected for sex hormone-binding globulin levels (SUV <subscript>SHBG</subscript> ). Results were correlated with parameters derived from full pharmacokinetic <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDHT and <superscript>15</superscript> O-H <subscript>2</subscript> O. Finally, the repeatability of individual quantitative uptake metrics was assessed. Results: Eighty-seven <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDHT-avid lesions were evaluated. <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDHT uptake was best described by an irreversible 2-tissue-compartment model. Replacing the continuous metabolite-corrected arterial plasma input function with an image-derived input function in combination with venous sample data provided similar K <subscript> i </subscript> results ( R <superscript>2</superscript> = 0.98). Patlak K <subscript> i </subscript> and SUV <subscript>AUC,PP</subscript> showed an excellent correlation ( R <superscript>2</superscript> > 0.9). SUV <subscript>BW</subscript> showed a moderate correlation to K <subscript> i </subscript> ( R <superscript>2</superscript> = 0.70, presumably due to fast <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDHT metabolism. When calculating SUV <subscript>SHBG</subscript> , correlation to K <subscript> i </subscript> improved ( R <superscript>2</superscript> = 0.88). The repeatability of full kinetic modeling parameters was inferior to that of simplified methods (repeatability coefficients > 36% vs. < 28%, respectively). <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDHT uptake showed minimal blood flow dependency. Conclusion: <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDHT kinetics in mCRPC patients are best described by an irreversible 2-tissue-compartment model with blood volume parameter. SUV <subscript>AUC,PP</subscript> showed a near-perfect correlation with the irreversible 2-tissue-compartment model analysis and can be used for accurate quantification of <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDHT uptake in whole-body PET/CT scans. In addition, SUV <subscript>SHBG</subscript> could potentially be used as an even simpler method to quantify <superscript>18</superscript> F-FDHT uptake when less complex scanning protocols and accuracy are required.<br /> (© 2019 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1535-5667
Volume :
60
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30850488
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.220111