Back to Search Start Over

Targeted therapies for previously treated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors :
Karner C
Kew K
Wakefield V
Masento N
Edwards SJ
Source :
BMJ open [BMJ Open] 2019 Mar 01; Vol. 9 (3), pp. e024691. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Mar 01.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of treatments for advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (amRCC) after treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted treatment.<br />Design: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies. MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched up to January 2018.<br />Participants: People with amRCC requiring treatment after VEGF-targeted treatment.<br />Interventions: Axitinib, cabozantinib, everolimus, lenvatinib with everolimus, nivolumab, sorafenib and best supportive care (BSC).<br />Outcomes: Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); secondary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), adverse events, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).<br />Results: Twelve studies were included (n=5144): five RCTs and seven observational studies. Lenvatinib with everolimus significantly increased OS and PFS over everolimus (HR 0.61, 95% Credible Interval [95%CrI]: 0.36 to 0.96 and 0.47, 95%CrI: 0.26 to 0.77, respectively) as did cabozantinib (HR 0.66, 95%CrI: 0.53 to 0.82 and 0.51, 95%CrI: 0.41 to 0.63, respectively). This remained the case when observational evidence was included. Nivolumab also significantly improved OS versus everolimus (HR 0.74, 95%CrI: 0.57 to 0.93). OS sensitivity analysis, including observational studies, indicates everolimus being more effective than axitinib and sorafenib. However, inconsistency was identified in the OS sensitivity analysis. PFS sensitivity analysis suggests axitinib is more effective than everolimus, which may be more effective than sorafenib. The results for ORR supported the OS and PFS analyses. Nivolumab is associated with fewer grade 3 or grade 4 adverse events than lenvatinib with everolimus or cabozantinib. HRQoL could not be analysed due to differences in tools used.<br />Conclusions: Lenvatinib with everolimus, cabozantinib and nivolumab are effective in prolonging the survival for people with amRCC subsequent to VEGF-targeted treatment, but there is considerable uncertainty about how they compare to each other and how much better they are than axitinib and sorafenib.<br />Prospero Registration Number: CRD42017071540.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2044-6055
Volume :
9
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMJ open
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30826762
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024691