Back to Search Start Over

Effectiveness and safety of dupilumab for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in a real-life French multicenter adult cohort.

Authors :
Faiz S
Giovannelli J
Podevin C
Jachiet M
Bouaziz JD
Reguiai Z
Nosbaum A
Lasek A
Ferrier le Bouedec MC
Du Thanh A
Raison-Peyron N
Tetart F
Duval-Modeste AB
Misery L
Aubin F
Dompmartin A
Morice C
Droitcourt C
Soria A
Arnault JP
Delaunay J
Mahé E
Richard MA
Schoeffler A
Lacour JP
Begon E
Walter-Lepage A
Dillies AS
Rappelle-Duruy S
Barete S
Bellon N
Bénéton N
Valois A
Barbarot S
Sénéchal J
Staumont-Sallé D
Source :
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology [J Am Acad Dermatol] 2019 Jul; Vol. 81 (1), pp. 143-151. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Feb 27.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Dupilumab is the first biologic available to treat atopic dermatitis (AD). Its effectiveness and safety were demonstrated in clinical trials.<br />Objective: We sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in adults with AD in a real-life French multicenter retrospective cohort.<br />Methods: We included patients treated during March 2017-April 2018. Efficacy outcomes, including Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) and Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores, were collected at baseline and 3 months when available. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded at follow-up.<br />Results: We included 241 patients. The median ± interquartile range (IQR) follow-up time was 3.8 ± 3.7 months. A ≥75% improvement in SCORAD was achieved in 27 of 163 (16.6%) patients, and a ≥75% improvement in EASI was achieved in 40 of 82 (48.8%) patients. The median SCORAD and EASI scores at 3 months were significantly lower than those at baseline (SCORAD ± IQR, 25 ± 21 vs 56 ± 27.4, P < 10 <superscript>-9</superscript> and EASI ± IQR, 4.1 ± 6.8 vs 17.9 ± 15.4, P < 10 <superscript>-9</superscript> , respectively). Conjunctivitis was reported in 84 of 241 (38.2%) patients. The proportion with eosinophilia (>500 cells/mm <superscript>3</superscript> ) during follow-up (57%) was higher than that at baseline (33.7%) (n = 172, P < 10 <superscript>-6</superscript> ). Dupilumab was stopped in 42 cases; 27 patients stopped because of AEs.<br />Limitations: No control group, missing data.<br />Conclusion: This real-life study demonstrated a similar dupilumab effectiveness as that seen in clinical trials, but it also revealed a higher frequency of conjunctivitis and eosinophilia.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1097-6787
Volume :
81
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30825533
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2019.02.053