Back to Search Start Over

Temporal trends of survival and utilization of mechanical circulatory support devices in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest secondary to ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation.

Authors :
Patel NJ
Atti V
Kumar V
Panakos A
Anantha Narayanan M
Bhardwaj B
Arora S
Deshmukh AJ
Patel N
Basir MB
Cohen MG
Kini AS
Sharma SK
Dangas G
O'Neill WW
Alfonso CE
Source :
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions [Catheter Cardiovasc Interv] 2019 Oct 01; Vol. 94 (4), pp. 578-587. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Feb 21.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Pulseless ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) is the initial rhythm in a third of in-hospital cardiac arrest patients. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device use remains poorly understood in this population.<br />Methods: We conducted an observational analysis of temporal trends in the utilization of MCS in VT/VF IHCA between January 2008 and December 2014 utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Using multivariable analysis, we assessed factors associated with MCS use and survival to discharge.<br />Results: Among 151,628 hospitalizations with VT/VF IHCA, 14,981 (9.9%) received MCS. Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) was the most commonly used MCS (9.1%). From 2008 to 2014, there was significant increase in the utilization of MCS (8.7-11%; p <subscript>trend</subscript>  < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, there was 12-fold increase and three-fold increase in the utilization of PVAD and ECMO respectively; however, there was no significant change in the use of IABP. Over the seven-year sample period, there was significant increase in the overall survival to hospital discharge (35.4-43.5%; p <subscript>trend</subscript>  < 0.0001). Survival to hospital discharge increased in both MCS and non-MCS groups.<br />Conclusion: There was significant increase in utilization of MCS after VT/VF IHCA during the study period. IABP was the most commonly utilized MCS. The survival to hospital discharge increased in the overall study population including both MCS and non-MCS groups. Future studies are needed to identify patient population most likely to benefit from the use of MCS after VT/VF IHCA.<br /> (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1522-726X
Volume :
94
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30790415
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28138