Back to Search Start Over

Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome: comparison with scrub typhus and clinical diagnostic prediction.

Authors :
Park SW
Lee CS
Kim JH
Bae IG
Moon C
Kwak YG
Kim BN
Lee JH
Ryu SY
Jang HC
Hur J
Jun JB
Jung Y
Chang HH
Kim YK
Hwang JH
Kim YS
Jeong HW
Song KH
Park WB
Kim ES
Oh MD
Source :
BMC infectious diseases [BMC Infect Dis] 2019 Feb 19; Vol. 19 (1), pp. 174. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Feb 19.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS) is emerging in Asian 3 countries, China, Japan and Korea, which are scrub typhus endemic areas, and its incidence is increasing. As the two infections overlap epidemiologically and clinically and the accessibility or sensitivity of diagnostic tests is limited, early clinical prediction may be useful for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.<br />Methods: Patients aged ≥16 years who were clinically suspected and laboratory-confirmed to be infected with Orientia tsutsugamushi or the SFTS virus in South Korea were enrolled. Clinical and laboratory parameters were compared. Scrub typhus was further subclassified according to the status of eschar and skin rash. An SFTS prediction scoring tool was generated based on a logistic regression analysis of SFTS compared with scrub typhus.<br />Results: The analysis was performed on 255 patients with scrub typhus and 107 patients with SFTS. At initial presentation, subjective symptoms except for gastrointestinal symptoms, were more prominent in scrub typhus patients. In addition to the characteristic eschar and skin rash, headache was significantly more prominent in scrub typhus, while laboratory abnormalities were more prominent in SFTS. Leukopenia (white blood cell count < 4000/mm <superscript>3</superscript> ; odds ratio [OR] 30.13), thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 80,000 /mm <superscript>3</superscript> ; OR 19.73) and low C-reactive protein (< 1 mg/dL; OR 67.46) were consistent risk factors for SFTS (all P < 0.001). A prediction score was generated using these 3 variables, and a score ≥ 2 had a sensitivity of 93.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.9-96.4%) and a specificity of 96.1% (95% CI, 93.8-97.6%) for SFTS.<br />Conclusion: This prediction scoring tool may be useful for differentiating SFTS from eschar- or skin rash-negative scrub typhus. It is a simple and readily applicable tool with potential for use in primary care settings.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1471-2334
Volume :
19
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMC infectious diseases
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30782137
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3773-1