Back to Search Start Over

Defining optimum surgical margins in buccoalveolar squamous cell carcinoma.

Defining optimum surgical margins in buccoalveolar squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors :
Mishra A
Malik A
Datta S
Mair M
Bal M
Nair D
Nair S
Chaturvedi P
Source :
European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology [Eur J Surg Oncol] 2019 Jun; Vol. 45 (6), pp. 1033-1038. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Feb 05.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical margin is one of the most important prognostic factors in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. There have been studies which refute the standard practice of considering 5 mm (mm) margin as free. Therefore we aimed to evaluate the impact of each mm of margin on the local recurrence free survival (LRFS) and to obtain a cut-off value which would impact the survival the most.<br />Material and Methods: This was a retrospective study of 602 treatment naïve patients of buccoalveolar complex cancer. ROC curve was plotted for each millimetre of margin to derive the cut-off margin for maximum LRFS. Multivariate analysis was done for the margin groups to calculate the margin beyond which no significant improvement on LRFS was achieved. Early and advanced tumors were also evaluated separately.<br />Results: A cut off margin of 5.5 mm was achieved on ROC for early (T1-T2) tumors and 6.5 mm cut off was achieved for advanced (T3-T4) tumors. Based on these cut off different margin groups were made. The cohort was grouped into positive margin, 1-5.5 mm, 5.6-7 mm and > 7 mm. Hazard ratio for patients with 1-5.5 mm and positive margin was 1.886 (95%CI, 1.15 to 3.09) and 5.58 (95%CI, 1.75 to 17.78) respectively. HR for margin 5.5 mm to 7 mm was 1.15 (95% CI, 1.15 to 2.06). There was no statistically significant difference in survival between margin groups of 5.6-7 mm and > 7 mm (p < 0.589) for both early and advanced tumors.<br />Conclusion: Minimum surgical margins of 5.5 mm in the final histopathology should be aimed for in the bucco-alveolar carcinomas. There was significant improvement in LRFS with increasing margins upto 7 mm. Taking margins beyond 7 mm does not improve LRFS.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-2157
Volume :
45
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30777600
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.01.224