Back to Search Start Over

Efficacy of Per-oral Methylene Blue Formulation for Screening Colonoscopy.

Authors :
Repici A
Wallace MB
East JE
Sharma P
Ramirez FC
Bruining DH
Young M
Gatof D
Irene Mimi Canto M
Marcon N
Cannizzaro R
Kiesslich R
Rutter M
Dekker E
Siersema PD
Spaander M
Kupcinskas L
Jonaitis L
Bisschops R
Radaelli F
Bhandari P
Wilson A
Early D
Gupta N
Vieth M
Lauwers GY
Rossini M
Hassan C
Source :
Gastroenterology [Gastroenterology] 2019 Jun; Vol. 156 (8), pp. 2198-2207.e1. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Feb 10.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background & Aims: Topically applied methylene blue dye chromoendoscopy is effective in improving detection of colorectal neoplasia. When combined with a pH- and time-dependent multimatrix structure, a per-oral methylene blue formulation (MB-MMX) can be delivered directly to the colorectal mucosa.<br />Methods: We performed a phase 3 study of 1205 patients scheduled for colorectal cancer screening or surveillance colonoscopies (50-75 years old) at 20 sites in Europe and the United States, from December 2013 through October 2016. Patients were randomly assigned to groups given 200 mg MB-MMX, placebo, or 100 mg MB-MMX (ratio of 2:2:1). The 100-mg MB-MMX group was included for masking purposes. MB-MMX and placebo tablets were administered with a 4-L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation. The patients then underwent colonoscopy by an experienced endoscopist with centralized double-reading. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with 1 adenoma or carcinoma (adenoma detection rate [ADR]). We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for differences in detection between the 200-mg MB-MMX and placebo groups. False-positive (resection rate for non-neoplastic polyps) and adverse events were assessed as secondary endpoints.<br />Results: The ADR was higher for the MB-MMX group (273 of 485 patients, 56.29%) than the placebo group (229 of 479 patients, 47.81%) (OR 1.46; 95% CI 1.09-1.96). The proportion of patients with nonpolypoid lesions was higher in the MB-MMX group (213 of 485 patients, 43.92%) than the placebo group (168 of 479 patients, 35.07%) (OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.21-2.26). The proportion of patients with adenomas ≤5 mm was higher in the MB-MMX group (180 of 485 patients, 37.11%) than the placebo group (148 of 479 patients, 30.90%) (OR 1.36; 95% CI 1.01-1.83), but there was no difference between groups in detection of polypoid or larger lesions. The false-positive rate did not differ significantly between groups (83 [23.31%] of 356 patients with non-neoplastic lesions in the MB-MMX vs 97 [29.75%] of 326 patients with non-neoplastic lesions in the placebo group). Overall, 0.7% of patients had severe adverse events but there was no significant difference between groups.<br />Conclusions: In a phase 3 trial of patients undergoing screening or surveillance colonoscopies, we found MB-MMX led to an absolute 8.5% increase in ADR, compared with placebo, without increasing the removal of non-neoplastic lesions. Clinicaltrials.gov no: NCT01694966.<br /> (Copyright © 2019 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1528-0012
Volume :
156
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Gastroenterology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30742834
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2019.02.001