Back to Search Start Over

Setting minimum standards for training in EUS and ERCP: results from a prospective multicenter study evaluating learning curves and competence among advanced endoscopy trainees.

Authors :
Wani S
Han S
Simon V
Hall M
Early D
Aagaard E
Abidi WM
Banerjee S
Baron TH
Bartel M
Bowman E
Brauer BC
Buscaglia JM
Carlin L
Chak A
Chatrath H
Choudhary A
Confer B
Coté GA
Das KK
DiMaio CJ
Dries AM
Edmundowicz SA
El Chafic AH
El Hajj I
Ellert S
Ferreira J
Gamboa A
Gan IS
Gangarosa L
Gannavarapu B
Gordon SR
Guda NM
Hammad HT
Harris C
Jalaj S
Jowell P
Kenshil S
Klapman J
Kochman ML
Komanduri S
Lang G
Lee LS
Loren DE
Lukens FJ
Mullady D
Muthusamy RV
Nett AS
Olyaee MS
Pakseresht K
Perera P
Pfau P
Piraka C
Poneros JM
Rastogi A
Razzak A
Riff B
Saligram S
Scheiman JM
Schuster I
Shah RJ
Sharma R
Spaete JP
Singh A
Sohail M
Sreenarasimhaiah J
Stevens T
Tabibian JH
Tzimas D
Uppal DS
Urayama S
Vitterbo D
Wang AY
Wassef W
Yachimski P
Zepeda-Gomez S
Zuchelli T
Keswani RN
Source :
Gastrointestinal endoscopy [Gastrointest Endosc] 2019 Jun; Vol. 89 (6), pp. 1160-1168.e9. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Feb 07.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background and Aims: Minimum EUS and ERCP volumes that should be offered per trainee in "high quality" advanced endoscopy training programs (AETPs) are not established. We aimed to define the number of procedures required by an "average" advanced endoscopy trainee (AET) to achieve competence in technical and cognitive EUS and ERCP tasks to help structure AETPs.<br />Methods: American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE)-recognized AETPs were invited to participate; AETs were graded on every fifth EUS and ERCP examination using a validated tool. Grading for each skill was done using a 4-point scoring system, and learning curves using cumulative sum analysis for overall, technical, and cognitive components of EUS and ERCP were shared with AETs and trainers quarterly. Generalized linear mixed-effects models with a random intercept for each AET were used to generate aggregate learning curves, allowing us to use data from all AETs to estimate the average learning experience for trainees.<br />Results: Among 62 invited AETPs, 37 AETs from 32 AETPs participated. Most AETs reported hands-on EUS (52%, median 20 cases) and ERCP (68%, median 50 cases) experience before starting an AETP. The median number of EUS and ERCPs performed per AET was 400 (range, 200-750) and 361 (range, 250-650), respectively. Overall, 2616 examinations were graded (EUS, 1277; ERCP-biliary, 1143; pancreatic, 196). Most graded EUS examinations were performed for pancreatobiliary indications (69.9%) and ERCP examinations for ASGE biliary grade of difficulty 1 (72.1%). The average AET achieved competence in core EUS and ERCP skills at approximately 225 and 250 cases, respectively. However, overall technical competence was achieved for grade 2 ERCP at about 300 cases.<br />Conclusion: The thresholds provided for an average AET to achieve competence in EUS and ERCP may be used by the ASGE and AETPs in establishing the minimal standards for case volume exposure for AETs during their training. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT02509416.).<br /> (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1097-6779
Volume :
89
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30738985
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2019.01.030