Back to Search
Start Over
Cardiac output measurement during exercise in COPD: A comparison of dye dilution and impedance cardiography.
- Source :
-
The clinical respiratory journal [Clin Respir J] 2019 Apr; Vol. 13 (4), pp. 222-231. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Feb 28. - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Introduction: Impedance cardiography (IC) derived from morphological analysis of the thoracic impedance signal is now commonly used for noninvasive assessment of cardiac output (CO) at rest and during exercise. However, in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), conflicting findings put its accuracy into question.<br />Objectives: We therefore compared concurrent CO measurements captured by IC (PhysioFlow: CO <subscript>IC</subscript> ) and by the indocyanine green dye dilution method (CO <subscript>DD</subscript> ) in patients with COPD.<br />Methods: Fifty paired CO measurements were concurrently obtained using the two methods from 10 patients (FEV <subscript>1</subscript> : 50.5 ± 17.5% predicted) at rest and during cycling at 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% peak work rate.<br />Results: From rest to peak exercise CO <subscript>IC</subscript> and CO <subscript>DD</subscript> were strongly correlated (r = 0.986, P < 0.001). The mean absolute and percentage differences between CO <subscript>IC</subscript> and CO <subscript>DD</subscript> were 1.08 L/min (limits of agreement (LoA): 0.05-2.11 L/min) and 18 ± 2%, respectively, with IC yielding systematically higher values. Bland-Altman analysis indicated that during exercise only 7 of the 50 paired measurements differed by more than 20%. When data were expressed as changes from rest, correlations and agreement between the two methods remained strong over the entire exercise range (r = 0.974, P < 0.001, with no significant difference: 0.19 L/min; LoA: -0.76 to 1.15 L/min). Oxygen uptake (VO <subscript>2</subscript> ) and CO <subscript>DD</subscript> were linearly related: r = 0.893 (P < 0.001), CO <subscript>DD</subscript> = 5.94 × VO <subscript>2</subscript> + 2.27 L/min. Similar results were obtained for VO <subscript>2</subscript> and CO <subscript>IC</subscript> (r = 0.885, P < 0.001, CO <subscript>IC</subscript> = 6.00 × VO <subscript>2</subscript> + 3.30 L/min).<br />Conclusions: These findings suggest that IC provides an acceptable CO measurement from rest to peak cycling exercise in patients with COPD.<br /> (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1752-699X
- Volume :
- 13
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- The clinical respiratory journal
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 30724023
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.13002