Masticatory performance of different impression methods for complete denture fabrication: A randomized controlled trial.

Objectives: To compare the effect of conventional complete dentures fabricated using two different impression methods on masticatory performance and factors relating to masticatory performance in a randomized controlled trial.
Methods: A crossover randomized controlled trial was performed with edentulous patients requiring maxillomandibular complete dentures. Mandibular complete dentures were fabricated using two different methods. The conventional method (C) used a custom tray border molded with an impression compound and a silicone. The simplified method (S) used a stock tray and an alginate. Participants were randomly divided into the two groups. In the C-S group, the conventional method was used first, followed by the simplified method; the order was reversed in the SC group. Adjustments were performed four times. The wash out period was 1 month. Masticatory performance as assessed by the mixing of a color-changeable chewing gum (mixing ability). Maximum occlusal force, occlusal contact area, and perceived chewing ability were assessed for each group.
Results: Twenty-seven patients underwent randomization and 24 participants completed the trial. With regard to occlusal contact area, the conventional method showed significantly larger occlusal contact area than the simplified method. No significant differences were observed between the two methods regarding mixing ability, maximum occlusal force, and perceived chewing ability.
Conclusions: This study showed that complete dentures fabricated with the conventional method had a significantly larger occlusal contact area than those made using the simplified method.
Clinical Significance: Complete dentures fabricated with the conventional method, comprising a preliminary impression using alginate in a stock tray followed by a final impression using silicone impression material in a border molded custom tray, resulted in fewer post-insertion adjustments than the simplified method, potentially contributing to earlier stability of new dentures.
(Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)