Back to Search Start Over

Scored minor criteria for severe community-acquired pneumonia predicted better.

Authors :
Guo Q
Song WD
Li HY
Zhou YP
Li M
Chen XK
Liu H
Peng HL
Yu HQ
Chen X
Liu N
Lü ZD
Liang LH
Zhao QZ
Jiang M
Source :
Respiratory research [Respir Res] 2019 Jan 31; Vol. 20 (1), pp. 22. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jan 31.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: Infectious Disease Society of America/American Thoracic Society (IDSA/ATS) minor criteria for severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are of unequal weight in predicting mortality, but the major problem associated with IDSA/ATS minor criteria might be a lack of consideration of weight in prediction in clinical practice. Would awarding different points to the presences of the minor criteria improve the accuracy of the scoring system? It is warranted to explore this intriguing hypothesis.<br />Methods: A total of 1230 CAP patients were recruited to a retrospective cohort study. This was tested against a prospective two-center cohort of 1749 adults with CAP. 2 points were assigned for the presence of PaO <subscript>2</subscript> /FiO <subscript>2</subscript>  ≤ 250 mmHg, confusion, or uremia on admission and 1 point for each of the others.<br />Results: The mortality rates, and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) and pneumonia severity index (PSI) scores increased significantly with the numbers of IDSA/ATS minor criteria present and minor criteria scores. The correlations of the minor criteria scores with the mortality rates were higher than those of the numbers of IDSA/ATS minor criteria present. As were the correlations of the minor criteria scores with SOFA and PSI scores, compared with the numbers of IDSA/ATS minor criteria present. The pattern of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and Youden's index of scored minor criteria of ≥2 scores or the presence of 2 or more IDSA/ATS minor criteria for prediction of mortality was the best in the retrospective cohort, and the former was better than the latter. The validation cohort confirmed a similar pattern. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of scored minor criteria was higher than that of IDSA/ATS minor criteria in the retrospective cohort, implying higher accuracy of scored version for predicting mortality. The validation cohort confirmed a similar paradigm.<br />Conclusions: Scored minor criteria orchestrated improvements in predicting mortality and severity in patients with CAP, and scored minor criteria of ≥2 scores or the presence of 2 or more IDSA/ATS minor criteria might be more valuable cut-off value for severe CAP, which might have implications for more accurate clinical triage decisions.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1465-993X
Volume :
20
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Respiratory research
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30704469
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-0991-4