Back to Search Start Over

Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotics for Bone and Joint Infection.

Authors :
Li HK
Rombach I
Zambellas R
Walker AS
McNally MA
Atkins BL
Lipsky BA
Hughes HC
Bose D
Kümin M
Scarborough C
Matthews PC
Brent AJ
Lomas J
Gundle R
Rogers M
Taylor A
Angus B
Byren I
Berendt AR
Warren S
Fitzgerald FE
Mack DJF
Hopkins S
Folb J
Reynolds HE
Moore E
Marshall J
Jenkins N
Moran CE
Woodhouse AF
Stafford S
Seaton RA
Vallance C
Hemsley CJ
Bisnauthsing K
Sandoe JAT
Aggarwal I
Ellis SC
Bunn DJ
Sutherland RK
Barlow G
Cooper C
Geue C
McMeekin N
Briggs AH
Sendi P
Khatamzas E
Wangrangsimakul T
Wong THN
Barrett LK
Alvand A
Old CF
Bostock J
Paul J
Cooke G
Thwaites GE
Bejon P
Scarborough M
Source :
The New England journal of medicine [N Engl J Med] 2019 Jan 31; Vol. 380 (5), pp. 425-436.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background: The management of complex orthopedic infections usually includes a prolonged course of intravenous antibiotic agents. We investigated whether oral antibiotic therapy is noninferior to intravenous antibiotic therapy for this indication.<br />Methods: We enrolled adults who were being treated for bone or joint infection at 26 U.K. centers. Within 7 days after surgery (or, if the infection was being managed without surgery, within 7 days after the start of antibiotic treatment), participants were randomly assigned to receive either intravenous or oral antibiotics to complete the first 6 weeks of therapy. Follow-on oral antibiotics were permitted in both groups. The primary end point was definitive treatment failure within 1 year after randomization. In the analysis of the risk of the primary end point, the noninferiority margin was 7.5 percentage points.<br />Results: Among the 1054 participants (527 in each group), end-point data were available for 1015 (96.3%). Treatment failure occurred in 74 of 506 participants (14.6%) in the intravenous group and 67 of 509 participants (13.2%) in the oral group. Missing end-point data (39 participants, 3.7%) were imputed. The intention-to-treat analysis showed a difference in the risk of definitive treatment failure (oral group vs. intravenous group) of -1.4 percentage points (90% confidence interval [CI], -4.9 to 2.2; 95% CI, -5.6 to 2.9), indicating noninferiority. Complete-case, per-protocol, and sensitivity analyses supported this result. The between-group difference in the incidence of serious adverse events was not significant (146 of 527 participants [27.7%] in the intravenous group and 138 of 527 [26.2%] in the oral group; P=0.58). Catheter complications, analyzed as a secondary end point, were more common in the intravenous group (9.4% vs. 1.0%).<br />Conclusions: Oral antibiotic therapy was noninferior to intravenous antibiotic therapy when used during the first 6 weeks for complex orthopedic infection, as assessed by treatment failure at 1 year. (Funded by the National Institute for Health Research; OVIVA Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN91566927 .).

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1533-4406
Volume :
380
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The New England journal of medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30699315
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1710926