Back to Search Start Over

Intraperitoneal α-Emitting Radioimmunotherapy with 211 At in Relapsed Ovarian Cancer: Long-Term Follow-up with Individual Absorbed Dose Estimations.

Authors :
Hallqvist A
Bergmark K
Bäck T
Andersson H
Dahm-Kähler P
Johansson M
Lindegren S
Jensen H
Jacobsson L
Hultborn R
Palm S
Albertsson P
Source :
Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine [J Nucl Med] 2019 Aug; Vol. 60 (8), pp. 1073-1079. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jan 25.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Eliminating microscopic residual disease with α-particle radiation is theoretically appealing. After extensive preclinical work with α-particle-emitting <superscript>211</superscript> At, we performed a phase I trial with intraperitoneal α-particle therapy in epithelial ovarian cancer using <superscript>211</superscript> At conjugated to MX35, the antigen-binding fragments-F(ab') <subscript>2</subscript> -of a mouse monoclonal antibody. We now present clinical outcome data and toxicity in a long-term follow-up with individual absorbed dose estimations. Methods: Twelve patients with relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer, achieving a second complete or nearly complete response with chemotherapy, received intraperitoneal treatment with escalating (20-215 MBq/L) activity concentrations of <superscript>211</superscript> At-MX35 F(ab') <subscript>2.</subscript> Results: The activity concentration was escalated to 215 MBq/L without any dose-limiting toxicities. Most toxicities were low-grade and likely related to the treatment procedure, not clearly linked to the α-particle irradiation, with no observed hematologic toxicity. One grade 3 fatigue and 1 grade 4 intestinal perforation during catheter implantation were observed. Four patients had a survival of more than 6 y, one of whom did not relapse. At progression, chemotherapy was given without signs of reduced tolerability. Overall median survival was 35 mo, with a 1-, 2-, 5-, and 10-y survival of 100%, 83%, 50%, and 25%, respectively. Calculations of the absorbed doses showed that a lower specific activity is associated with a lower single-cell dose, whereas a high specific activity may result in a lower central dose in microtumors. Individual differences in absorbed dose to possible microtumors were due to variations in administered activity and the specific activity. Conclusion : No apparent signs of radiation-induced toxicity or decreased tolerance to relapse therapy were observed. The dosimetric calculations show that further optimization is advisable to increase the efficacy and reduce possible long-term toxicity.<br /> (© 2019 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1535-5667
Volume :
60
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30683761
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.220384