Back to Search Start Over

Estimation of impact of RPE65- mediated inherited retinal disease on quality of life and the potential benefits of gene therapy.

Authors :
Lloyd A
Piglowska N
Ciulla T
Pitluck S
Johnson S
Buessing M
O'Connell T
Source :
The British journal of ophthalmology [Br J Ophthalmol] 2019 Nov; Vol. 103 (11), pp. 1610-1614. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jan 18.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Background/aims: In rare diseases, health-related quality of life (HRQL) data can be difficult to capture. Given the ultrarare nature of RPE65 -mediated inherited retinal disease (IRD), it was not feasible to recruit a patient sample and collect HRQL data prospectively. The objectives of this study were to develop health state descriptions of RPE65 -mediated IRD, and to estimate associated patient utilities.<br />Methods: Vignette descriptions of IRD states were developed and then assessed to elicit utilities. The vignettes ranged from moderate vision loss through to hand motion to no light perception (NLP). Six retina specialists with additional expertise in IRDs provided a proxy valuation of the vignettes using generic measures of health-the 5-level version of EQ-5D-5L and Health Utility Index 3 (HUI3). The data were then scored using standard methods for each instrument.<br />Results: Weights from both HRQL measures revealed a large decline in scores with vision loss. The EQ-5D-5L weights ranged from 0.709 for moderate vision loss to 0.152 for hand motion to NLP. The HUI3 weights ranged from 0.519 to - 0.039, respectively. A decline was seen on both measures, and the degree of decline from moderate vision loss to NLP was identical on both (-0.56).<br />Conclusion: This is the first study to report HRQL weights (or utilities) for health states describing different levels of vision loss in patients with IRD, specifically those with RPE65 -mediated disease. The parallel decline in scores from the EQ-5D and HUI3 corroborates the substantial impact of progressive vision loss on HRQL.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: AL and NP work for Acaster Lloyd, a private consultancy which was paid a fixed fee for work on this project. SJ, MB and TOC work for Medicus Economics and were engaged by Spark Therapeutics to provide economic modelling services on the project for a fixed fee. TC and SP are employees of Spark Therapeutics, which owns LUXTURNA—a treatment for RPE65-mediated IRD.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1468-2079
Volume :
103
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The British journal of ophthalmology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30658988
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313089