Back to Search Start Over

Improved repeatability of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using the complex MRI signal to derive arterial input functions: a test-retest study in prostate cancer patients.

Authors :
Klawer EME
van Houdt PJ
Simonis FFJ
van den Berg CAT
Pos FJ
Heijmink SWTPJ
Isebaert S
Haustermans K
van der Heide UA
Source :
Magnetic resonance in medicine [Magn Reson Med] 2019 May; Vol. 81 (5), pp. 3358-3369. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jan 17.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Purpose: The arterial input function (AIF) is a major source of uncertainty in tracer kinetic (TK) analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI data. The aim of this study was to investigate the repeatability of AIFs extracted from the complex signal and of the resulting TK parameters in prostate cancer patients.<br />Methods: Twenty-two patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer underwent a 3T MRI exam twice. DCE-MRI data were acquired with a 3D spoiled gradient echo sequence. AIFs were extracted from the magnitude of the signal (AIF <subscript>MAGN</subscript> ), phase (AIF <subscript>PHASE</subscript> ), and complex signal (AIF <subscript>COMPLEX</subscript> ). The Tofts model was applied to extract K <superscript>trans</superscript> , k <subscript>ep</subscript> and v <subscript>e</subscript> . Repeatability of AIF curve characteristics and TK parameters was assessed with the within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV).<br />Results: The wCV for peak height and full width at half maximum for AIF <subscript>COMPLEX</subscript> (7% and 8%) indicated an improved repeatability compared to AIF <subscript>MAGN</subscript> (12% and 12%) and AIF <subscript>PHASE</subscript> (12% and 7%). This translated in lower wCV values for K <superscript>trans</superscript> (11%) with AIF <subscript>COMPLEX</subscript> in comparison to AIF <subscript>MAGN</subscript> (24%) and AIF <subscript>PHASE</subscript> (15%). For k <subscript>ep</subscript> , the wCV was 16% with AIF <subscript>MAGN</subscript> , 13% with AIF <subscript>PHASE</subscript> , and 13% with AIF <subscript>COMPLEX</subscript> .<br />Conclusion: Repeatability of AIF <subscript>PHASE</subscript> and AIF <subscript>COMPLEX</subscript> is higher than for AIF <subscript>MAGN</subscript> , resulting in a better repeatability of TK parameters. Thus, use of either AIF <subscript>PHASE</subscript> or AIF <subscript>COMPLEX</subscript> improves the robustness of quantitative analysis of DCE-MRI in prostate cancer.<br /> (© 2019 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1522-2594
Volume :
81
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Magnetic resonance in medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30656738
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27646