Back to Search
Start Over
Improved repeatability of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using the complex MRI signal to derive arterial input functions: a test-retest study in prostate cancer patients.
- Source :
-
Magnetic resonance in medicine [Magn Reson Med] 2019 May; Vol. 81 (5), pp. 3358-3369. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jan 17. - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Purpose: The arterial input function (AIF) is a major source of uncertainty in tracer kinetic (TK) analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI data. The aim of this study was to investigate the repeatability of AIFs extracted from the complex signal and of the resulting TK parameters in prostate cancer patients.<br />Methods: Twenty-two patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer underwent a 3T MRI exam twice. DCE-MRI data were acquired with a 3D spoiled gradient echo sequence. AIFs were extracted from the magnitude of the signal (AIF <subscript>MAGN</subscript> ), phase (AIF <subscript>PHASE</subscript> ), and complex signal (AIF <subscript>COMPLEX</subscript> ). The Tofts model was applied to extract K <superscript>trans</superscript> , k <subscript>ep</subscript> and v <subscript>e</subscript> . Repeatability of AIF curve characteristics and TK parameters was assessed with the within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV).<br />Results: The wCV for peak height and full width at half maximum for AIF <subscript>COMPLEX</subscript> (7% and 8%) indicated an improved repeatability compared to AIF <subscript>MAGN</subscript> (12% and 12%) and AIF <subscript>PHASE</subscript> (12% and 7%). This translated in lower wCV values for K <superscript>trans</superscript> (11%) with AIF <subscript>COMPLEX</subscript> in comparison to AIF <subscript>MAGN</subscript> (24%) and AIF <subscript>PHASE</subscript> (15%). For k <subscript>ep</subscript> , the wCV was 16% with AIF <subscript>MAGN</subscript> , 13% with AIF <subscript>PHASE</subscript> , and 13% with AIF <subscript>COMPLEX</subscript> .<br />Conclusion: Repeatability of AIF <subscript>PHASE</subscript> and AIF <subscript>COMPLEX</subscript> is higher than for AIF <subscript>MAGN</subscript> , resulting in a better repeatability of TK parameters. Thus, use of either AIF <subscript>PHASE</subscript> or AIF <subscript>COMPLEX</subscript> improves the robustness of quantitative analysis of DCE-MRI in prostate cancer.<br /> (© 2019 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.)
- Subjects :
- Aged
Algorithms
Biopsy
Computer Simulation
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted methods
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Kinetics
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Statistical
Reproducibility of Results
Contrast Media administration & dosage
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms diagnostic imaging
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1522-2594
- Volume :
- 81
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Magnetic resonance in medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 30656738
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27646