Back to Search Start Over

Buccolingual Inclination Control of Upper Central Incisors of Aligners: A Comparison with Conventional and Self-Ligating Brackets.

Authors :
Sfondrini MF
Gandini P
Castroflorio T
Garino F
Mergati L
D'Anca K
Trovati F
Scribante A
Source :
BioMed research international [Biomed Res Int] 2018 Nov 29; Vol. 2018, pp. 9341821. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Nov 29 (Print Publication: 2018).
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Objective: The upper incisors torque expression is essential for the orthodontic treatment accuracy. Various orthodontic devices are claimed to have different inclination control capacity. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the radiographic buccolingual inclination of upper incisors in patients treated with three different orthodontic techniques.<br />Material and Methods: Conventional brackets (Victory, 3M), self-ligating appliances (Damon Q, Ormco), and aligners (Invisalign, Align Technology) were tested. Cephalometric data of 25 patients with similar skeletal and dental pretreatment parameters were collected for each technique. Position changes of upper central incisors were assessed with radiographic evaluation before and after therapy. Three different parameters were considered: 11 <superscript>∧</superscript> SnaSnp, 11 <superscript>∧</superscript> Ocl and I+ TVL. All variables were measured before (T0) and after (T1) treatment and their variation over treatment was assessed.<br />Results: When evaluating angular measurements, 11 <superscript>∧</superscript> SnaSnp and 11 <superscript>∧</superscript> Ocl angles showed the highest numeric variation with conventional brackets. Lowest values were reported with aligners. However, the differences among various techniques were not significant for both angles (P>0.05). Also I+ TVL linear value variation did not show significant differences among the different groups tested (P>0.05).<br />Conclusion: Conventional multibrackets appliance showed the highest incisal position variations over treatment, but the differences among various groups were not significantly different.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2314-6141
Volume :
2018
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BioMed research international
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30627583
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9341821