Back to Search Start Over

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Oncology Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors :
Landes U
Iakobishvili Z
Vronsky D
Zusman O
Barsheshet A
Jaffe R
Jubran A
Yoon SH
Makkar RR
Taramasso M
Russo M
Maisano F
Sinning JM
Shamekhi J
Biasco L
Pedrazzini G
Moccetti M
Latib A
Pagnesi M
Colombo A
Tamburino C
D' Arrigo P
Windecker S
Pilgrim T
Tchetche D
De Biase C
Guerrero M
Iftikhar O
Bosmans J
Bedzra E
Dvir D
Mylotte D
Sievert H
Watanabe Y
Søndergaard L
Dagnegård H
Codner P
Kodali S
Leon M
Kornowski R
Source :
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions [JACC Cardiovasc Interv] 2019 Jan 14; Vol. 12 (1), pp. 78-86.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Objectives: The authors sought to collect data on contemporary practice and outcome of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in oncology patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).<br />Background: Oncology patients with severe AS are often denied valve replacement. TAVR may be an emerging treatment option.<br />Methods: A worldwide registry was designed to collect data on patients who undergo TAVR while having active malignancy. Data from 222 cancer patients from 18 TAVR centers were compared versus 2,522 "no-cancer" patients from 5 participating centers. Propensity-score matching was performed to further adjust for bias.<br />Results: Cancer patients' age was 78.8 ± 7.5 years, STS score 4.9 ± 3.4%, 62% men. Most frequent cancers were gastrointestinal (22%), prostate (16%), breast (15%), hematologic (15%), and lung (11%). At the time of TAVR, 40% had stage 4 cancer. Periprocedural complications were comparable between the groups. Although 30-day mortality was similar, 1-year mortality was higher in cancer patients (15% vs. 9%; p < 0.001); one-half of the deaths were due to neoplasm. Among patients who survived 1 year after the TAVR, one-third were in remission/cured from cancer. Progressive malignancy (stage III to IV) was a strong mortality predictor (hazard ratio: 2.37; 95% confidence interval: 1.74 to 3.23; p < 0.001), whereas stage I to II cancer was not associated with higher mortality compared with no-cancer patients.<br />Conclusions: TAVR in cancer patients is associated with similar short-term but worse long-term prognosis compared with patients without cancer. Among this cohort, mortality is largely driven by cancer, and progressive malignancy is a strong mortality predictor. Importantly, 85% of the patients were alive at 1 year, one-third were in remission/cured from cancer. (Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Oncology Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis [TOP-AS]; NCT03181997).<br /> (Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1876-7605
Volume :
12
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30621982
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2018.10.026