Back to Search Start Over

High-flow oxygen therapy in tracheostomized patients at high risk of weaning failure.

Authors :
Stripoli T
Spadaro S
Di Mussi R
Volta CA
Trerotoli P
De Carlo F
Iannuzziello R
Sechi F
Pierucci P
Staffieri F
Bruno F
Camporota L
Grasso S
Source :
Annals of intensive care [Ann Intensive Care] 2019 Jan 07; Vol. 9 (1), pp. 4. Date of Electronic Publication: 2019 Jan 07.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Purpose: High-flow oxygen therapy delivered through nasal cannulae improves oxygenation and decreases work of breathing in critically ill patients. Little is known of the physiological effects of high-flow oxygen therapy applied to the tracheostomy cannula (T-HF). In this study, we compared the effects of T-HF or conventional low-flow oxygen therapy (conventional O <subscript>2</subscript> ) on neuro-ventilatory drive, work of breathing, respiratory rate (RR) and gas exchange, in a mixed population of tracheostomized patients at high risk of weaning failure.<br />Methods: This was a single-center, unblinded, cross-over study on fourteen patients. After disconnection from the ventilator, each patient received two 1-h periods of T-HF (T-HF1 and T-HF2) alternated with 1 h of conventional O <subscript>2</subscript> . The inspiratory oxygen fraction was titrated to achieve an arterial O <subscript>2</subscript> saturation target of 94-98% (88-92% in COPD patients). We recorded neuro-ventilatory drive (electrical diaphragmatic activity, EAdi), work of breathing (inspiratory muscular pressure-time product per breath and per minute, PTP <subscript>musc/b</subscript> and PTP <subscript>musc/min</subscript> , respectively) respiratory rate and arterial blood gases.<br />Results: The EAdi <subscript>peak</subscript> remained unchanged (mean ± SD) in the T-HF1, conventional O <subscript>2</subscript> and T-HF2 study periods (8.8 ± 4.3 μV vs 8.9 ± 4.8 μV vs 9.0 ± 4.1 μV, respectively, p = 0.99). Similarly, PTP <subscript>musc/b</subscript> and PTP <subscript>musc/min</subscript> , RR and gas exchange remained unchanged.<br />Conclusions: In tracheostomized patients at high risk of weaning failure from mechanical ventilation, T-HF did not improve neuro-ventilatory drive, work of breathing, respiratory rate and gas exchange compared with conventional O <subscript>2</subscript> after disconnection from the ventilator. The present findings might suggest that physiological effects of high-flow therapy through tracheostomy substantially differ from nasal high flow.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2110-5820
Volume :
9
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Annals of intensive care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30617626
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0482-2