Electroacupuncture Versus Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Plus Solifenacin for Women With Mixed Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture vs pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) plus solifenacin for women with mixed urinary incontinence (MUI).
Patients and Methods: This randomized controlled noninferiority trial was conducted at 10 hospitals in China between March 1, 2014, and October 10, 2016. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive electroacupuncture (36 sessions) over 12 weeks with 24 weeks of follow-up or PFMT-solifenacin (5 mg/d) over 36 weeks. The primary outcome was percentage change from baseline to week 12 in mean 72-hour incontinence episode frequency (IEF) measured by the 72-hour bladder diary. It was analyzed in the per-protocol set with a prespecified noninferiority margin of 15%.
Results: Of 500 women with MUI who were randomized, 467 (239 in the electroacupuncture group and 228 in the PFMT-solifenacin group) completed treatment per protocol and were included in the primary outcome analysis. At weeks 1 through 12, the percentage of reduction from baseline in mean 72-hour IEF was 37.83% in the electroacupuncture group and 36.49% in the PFMT-solifenacin group (between-group difference, -1.34% [95% CI, -9.78% to 7.10%]; P<.001 for noninferiority), which demonstrates noninferiority; the treatment effect persisted throughout follow-up. Statistically significant improvements were found for secondary outcomes in both groups, with no meaningful difference between treatments.
Conclusion: In women with moderate to severe MUI, electroacupuncture was not inferior to PFMT-solifenacin in decreasing the 72-hour IEF and shows promise as an effective alternative for the treatment of MUI.
Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02047032.
(Copyright © 2018 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)