Cite
Sealing Devices in Chimney Aortic Repair (CH EVAS) Versus Chimney Aortic Repair with Conventional Devices (CH EVAR): A Systematic Review.
MLA
Mazzaccaro, Daniela, et al. “Sealing Devices in Chimney Aortic Repair (CH EVAS) Versus Chimney Aortic Repair with Conventional Devices (CH EVAR): A Systematic Review.” Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 42, no. 4, Apr. 2019, pp. 487–94. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-2149-z.
APA
Mazzaccaro, D., Settembrini, A. M., Muzzarelli, L., Ambrogi, F., Milani, V., & Nano, G. (2019). Sealing Devices in Chimney Aortic Repair (CH EVAS) Versus Chimney Aortic Repair with Conventional Devices (CH EVAR): A Systematic Review. Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, 42(4), 487–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-2149-z
Chicago
Mazzaccaro, Daniela, Alberto M Settembrini, Lorenzo Muzzarelli, Federico Ambrogi, Valentina Milani, and Giovanni Nano. 2019. “Sealing Devices in Chimney Aortic Repair (CH EVAS) Versus Chimney Aortic Repair with Conventional Devices (CH EVAR): A Systematic Review.” Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology 42 (4): 487–94. doi:10.1007/s00270-018-2149-z.