Back to Search
Start Over
A phase II, randomised study of mFOLFOX6 with or without the Akt inhibitor ipatasertib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer.
- Source :
-
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) [Eur J Cancer] 2019 Feb; Vol. 108, pp. 17-24. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Dec 25. - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Background: Akt activation is common in gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) and is associated with chemotherapy resistance. Treatment with ipatasertib, a pan-Akt inhibitor, may potentiate the efficacy of chemotherapy in GC/GEJC.<br />Patients and Methods: In this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, phase II trial, patients with locally advanced or metastatic GC/GEJC not amenable to curative therapy were randomised 1:1 to receive ipatasertib or placebo, plus mFOLFOX6 (modified regimen of leucovorin, bolus and infusional 5-fluorouracil [5-FU], and oxaliplatin). The co-primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and in phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-low patients. Secondary end-points included PFS in patients with PI3K/Akt pathway-activated tumours; overall survival, investigator-assessed objective response rate and duration of response in the ITT population; and safety assessments.<br />Results: In 153 enrolled patients, the median PFS (ITT) was 6.6 months (90% confidence interval [CI], 5.7-7.5) with ipatasertib/mFOLFOX6 versus 7.5 months (90% CI, 6.2-8.1) with placebo/mFOLFOX6 (hazard ratio, 1.12; 90% CI, 0.81-1.55; P = 0.56). No statistically significant PFS benefit was observed in biomarker-selected patient subgroups (PTEN-low and PI3K/Akt pathway-activated tumours) with ipatasertib/mFOLFOX6 versus placebo/mFOLFOX6. Other secondary end-points did not favour the ipatasertib/mFOLFOX6 treatment arm. The percentages of patients with ≥1 adverse event (AE, 100% versus 98%) and grade ≥3 AEs (79% versus 74%) were similar between arms. Higher rates of AEs leading to treatment withdrawal (16% versus 6%) and serious AEs were reported in the ipatasertib arm (54% versus 43%). Thirty-nine and 29 deaths occurred in the ipatasertib and placebo arms, respectively.<br />Conclusions: Ipatasertib/mFOLFOX6 compared with placebo/mFOLFOX6 did not improve PFS in unselected or biomarker-selected patients. No unexpected safety concerns were observed.<br />Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01896531).<br /> (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Bone Neoplasms drug therapy
Bone Neoplasms secondary
Carcinoma secondary
Female
Fluorouracil therapeutic use
Humans
Leucovorin therapeutic use
Liver Neoplasms secondary
Lung Neoplasms secondary
Lymph Nodes pathology
Male
Middle Aged
Organoplatinum Compounds therapeutic use
Progression-Free Survival
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt antagonists & inhibitors
Stomach Neoplasms pathology
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use
Carcinoma drug therapy
Esophagogastric Junction
Liver Neoplasms drug therapy
Lung Neoplasms drug therapy
Piperazines therapeutic use
Pyrimidines therapeutic use
Stomach Neoplasms drug therapy
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1879-0852
- Volume :
- 108
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 30592991
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2018.11.017