Back to Search
Start Over
Spine Deformity With Fused Ribs Treated With Proximal Rib- Versus Spine-Based Growing Constructs.
- Source :
-
Spine deformity [Spine Deform] 2019 Jan; Vol. 7 (1), pp. 152-157. - Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Study Design: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.<br />Objective: To compare the use of spine-based versus rib-based implants for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) in the setting of rib fusions.<br />Summary of Background Data: Treatment for severe early-onset spinal deformity with rib fusions includes growing spine devices with proximal rib or spine anchors. The results of treatment, however, have not been compared between spine-based versus rib-based proximal anchors.<br />Methods: 169 patients with rib fusions treated with rib-based or spine-based constructs and minimum two-year follow-up were included. Sixteen patients were treated with proximal spine-based anchors and 153 with proximal rib-based devices (VEPTRs). Overall, 104 of the patients with rib-based fixation underwent thoracoplasty at the index surgery. We evaluated change in T1-T12 and T1-S1 height, coronal Cobb angle, kyphosis, and number of lengthening/revision surgeries.<br />Results: Kyphosis increased a mean of 7° in the rib-based group and decreased a mean of 20 degrees in the spine-based group (p = .002). Major Cobb angle decreased in both groups (p < .0001); however, the spine-based group had greater Cobb angle improvement (24 vs. 11 degrees, p = .04). From implant and lengthening of distraction devices, there was a mean 3.3-cm (22%) increase in T1-T12 height and a mean of 8.0 lengthenings in the rib-based group compared with a 5.7-cm increase and 6.3 lengthening surgeries in the spine-based group. Patients with rib-based constructs had a mean of 11 total procedures, whereas spine-based patients had a mean of 8.<br />Conclusions: Patients underwent a mean of eight lengthening surgeries before final fusion or cessation of lengthening with a modest 2.3-cm increase in T1-T12 height. Compared with proximal rib anchors, proximal spine anchors controlled kyphosis and improved Cobb angle correction for early-onset scoliosis with rib fusions.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 Scoliosis Research Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Age Factors
Age of Onset
Child, Preschool
Female
Humans
Male
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis Design
Retrospective Studies
Scoliosis complications
Spinal Fusion methods
Spine abnormalities
Thoracic Diseases complications
Thoracic Vertebrae surgery
Thoracoplasty instrumentation
Thoracoplasty methods
Treatment Outcome
Ribs surgery
Scoliosis surgery
Spinal Fusion instrumentation
Spine surgery
Suture Anchors
Thoracic Diseases surgery
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2212-1358
- Volume :
- 7
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Spine deformity
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 30587309
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.05.011