Back to Search Start Over

Chemical characterization and source apportionment of PM 2.5 personal exposure of two cohorts living in urban and suburban Beijing.

Authors :
Shang J
Khuzestani RB
Tian J
Schauer JJ
Hua J
Zhang Y
Cai T
Fang D
An J
Zhang Y
Source :
Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) [Environ Pollut] 2019 Mar; Vol. 246, pp. 225-236. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Dec 04.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

In the study, personal PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> exposures and their source contributions were characterized for 159 subjects living in the Beijing Metropolitan area. The exposures and sources were examined as functions of residential location, season, vocation, cigarette smoking, and time spent outdoors. Sampling was performed for two categories of volunteers, guards and students, that lived in urban and suburban areas of Beijing. Samples were collected using portable PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> monitors during summer and winter. Exposure measurements were supplemented with a questionnaire that tracked personal activity and time spent in microenvironments that may have impacted exposures. Simultaneously, ambient PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> data were obtained from national network stations located at the Gucheng and Huairouzhen sites. These data were used as a comparison against the personal PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> exposures and produced poor correlations between personal and ambient PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> . These results demonstrate that individual behavior strongly affects personal PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> exposure. Six primary sources of personal PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> exposure were determined using a positive matrix factorization (PMF) source apportionment model. These sources included Roadway Transport Source, Soil/Dust Source, Industrial/Combustion Source, Secondary Inorganic Source, Cd Source, and Household Heating Source. Averaged across all subjects and seasons, the highest source contribution was Secondary Inorganic Source (24.8% ± 32.6%, AVG ± STD), whereas the largest primary ambient source was determined to be Roadway Transport (20.9% ± 13.6%). Subjects were classified according to the questionnaire and were used to help understand the relationship between personal activity and source contribution to PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> exposure. In general, primary ambient sources showed only significant spatial and seasonal differences, while secondary sources differed significantly between populations with different personal behavior. In particular, Cd source was found to be related to smoking exposure and was the most unpredictable source, with significant differences between populations of different sites, vocations, smoking exposures, and outdoor time.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-6424
Volume :
246
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30557796
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.076