Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of 3-month visual outcomes of a spherical and a toric trifocal intraocular lens.

Authors :
Poyales F
Garzon N
Source :
Journal of cataract and refractive surgery [J Cataract Refract Surg] 2019 Feb; Vol. 45 (2), pp. 135-145. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Nov 30.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate visual outcomes and satisfaction after implantation of 2 trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs): a spherical IOL and a toric IOL.<br />Setting: IOA Madrid Innova Ocular, Madrid, Spain.<br />Design: Prospective, controlled clinical trial.<br />Methods: Patients (>50 years) were implanted bilaterally with either a trifocal spherical hydrophilic IOL (FineVision POD F) if corneal astigmatism was 1.0 diopter (D) or less, or with a trifocal toric hydrophilic IOL (FineVision POD FT) if astigmatism was more than 1.0 D. Outcomes analyzed 3 months after surgery included monocular and binocular visual acuities at distance, near, and intermediate, both uncorrected and corrected. Defocus curves, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction were also assessed.<br />Results: There was no statistically significant difference between groups in monocular uncorrected distance (UDVA) (P = .38), monocular corrected distance (CDVA) (P = .22), or distance-corrected intermediate (DCIVA) (P = .95) visual acuities; however, the distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) was slightly better in the spherical IOL group (P = .008). The UDVA was 20/25 or better in 89% of eyes in the spherical IOL group and 93% in the toric IOL group. The DCIVA was 20/32 or better in 92% of eyes in the spherical IOL group and 93% in the toric IOL group at 80 cm (Radner Vissum chart), and 20/32 or better in 100% of eyes in both groups at 63 cm (Colenbrander chart). The DCNVA (Radner chart) was 20/32 or better in 89% of eyes in the spherical IOL group and 90% of eyes in the toric IOL group. There was no difference between the groups in contrast sensitivity, defocus curves, cylinder, or satisfaction results.<br />Conclusion: Patients had significant improvement in visual acuity and gained functional uncorrected visual acuity across all distances in both groups. Satisfaction was high with both IOLs.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-4502
Volume :
45
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of cataract and refractive surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30509746
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.09.025