Back to Search Start Over

Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing.

Authors :
Prager EM
Chambers KE
Plotkin JL
McArthur DL
Bandrowski AE
Bansal N
Martone ME
Bergstrom HC
Bespalov A
Graf C
Source :
Journal of neuroscience research [J Neurosci Res] 2019 Apr; Vol. 97 (4), pp. 377-390. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Dec 02.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Progress in basic and clinical research is slowed when researchers fail to provide a complete and accurate report of how a study was designed, executed, and the results analyzed. Publishing rigorous scientific research involves a full description of the methods, materials, procedures, and outcomes. Investigators may fail to provide a complete description of how their study was designed and executed because they may not know how to accurately report the information or the mechanisms are not in place to facilitate transparent reporting. Here, we provide an overview of how authors can write manuscripts in a transparent and thorough manner. We introduce a set of reporting criteria that can be used for publishing, including recommendations on reporting the experimental design and statistical approaches. We also discuss how to accurately visualize the results and provide recommendations for peer reviewers to enhance rigor and transparency. Incorporating transparency practices into research manuscripts will significantly improve the reproducibility of the results by independent laboratories.<br /> (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1097-4547
Volume :
97
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of neuroscience research
Publication Type :
Editorial & Opinion
Accession number :
30506706
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24340